18 and older, any sex, with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Primary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 modified version (2-week recall) is a self-rated questionnaire to evaluate the severity and distribution of autonomic symptoms in various autonomic nerve disorders. It consists of 31 questions in 6 weighted domains (orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal {GI}-mixed upper and diarrhea, bladder, and pupillomotor). A weighted total score of 0 (mild) to 100 (severe) was determined by adding a maximum raw score for each domain. Higher scores indicated a more severe degree of autonomic symptoms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
-14.369
± 15.2541
Placebo
-15.957
± 17.2963
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the MaPSPrimary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Malmö POTS Symptom Score (MaPS) score is a dedicated POTS symptom scoring questionnaire. The score consists of 12 questions that assess symptom burden related (tachycardia, palpitations, dizziness, presyncope) and unrelated to orthostatic intolerance (GI symptoms, insomnia, concentration difficulties). Participants graded their symptoms for the past 7 days using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst possible). The total score was calculated by summing up the items/individual items and range was 0 to 120 points, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
-23.5
± 25.87
Placebo
-19.8
± 27.75
Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEsPrimary· From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 60 days post last dose of study drug, up to 236 days
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other medically important event. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs w
TEAEs
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
31
Placebo
14
TESAEs
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
0
Placebo
0
Percentage of Participants With Improved PGI-S at Week 24Secondary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Patient Global Impression-Severity (PGI-S) is a participant-rated, single-item scale to assess the severity of a health condition. The scale was used to assess the severity of symptoms over the past week (1-week recall) and overall experience of symptoms over the past 2 weeks (2-week recall). Both were rated on a 4-point type Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. An "improved PGI-S" was defined by a change from baseline of -3, -2 and -1.
1-week recall
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
45.5
Placebo
53.3
2-week recall
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
54.5
Placebo
33.3
Percentage of Participants With Improved in PGI-C at Week 24Secondary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Patient Global Impression-Change (PGIC) is a single-item scale to capture the participant's perception of a change in their overall symptom severity. Overall change in symptoms was rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 (much better), 2 (somewhat better), 3 (a little better), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (somewhat worse), and 7 (much worse). Higher PGI-C scores signify worse outcome. An "improved PGI-C" was defined by a change from baseline of 1, 2 and 3.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
65.4
Placebo
53.3
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 8aSecondary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 8a assesses the impact and perceived fatigue during the last 7 days. This validated 8-question scale has 5 response options, with scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Total scores ranged from 8 to 40; higher scores indicated higher fatigue levels and were converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A decrease in T-score (negative change from baseline) indicated improvement in fatigue.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
-9.5
± 8.77
Placebo
-7.0
± 9.40
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 6aSecondary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 6a assesses the frequency of cognitive difficulties experienced in the past 7 days. The questionnaire comprises 6 questions on subjective cognitive difficulties regarding a participant's concentration, memory, language, mental acuity, and perceived changes in cognitive functioning. The participant marks their response on a 5-point Likert scale (1: never and 5: very often). Scores ranged from 6 to 30; higher scores indicated worse perceived cognitive functioning and were converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. An increase in T-
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
3.9
± 9.58
Placebo
6.7
± 9.74
Percent Change From Baseline in Total IgG Levels at Week 24Secondary· Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Blood samples for immunoglobulin G (IgG) analysis were collected at specified time points. Total IgG concentrations were quantified using validated methods at a central laboratory.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
-69.341
± 6.0637
Placebo
5.868
± 13.1379
Serum Concentration of EfgartigimodSecondary· Pre-dose and post-dose at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 1, 4, 12 and at Week 24
Serum samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine the concentration of efgartigimod.
Baseline, pre-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
NA
± NA
Baseline, post-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
260536
± 235110
Week 1, pre-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
10711
± 3580
Week 1, post-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
235100
± 68316
Week 4, pre-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
12612
± 5631
Week 4, post-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
230308
± 54329
Week 12, pre-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
18966
± 39993
Week 12, post-dose
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
216760
± 56621
Number of Participants With ADAs Against EfgartigimodSecondary· Up to Week 24
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against efgartigimod. ADA incidence reported here was defined as total number of participants with treatment-induced and treatment-boosted ADA. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as a baseline negative sample and at least 1 positive post-baseline sample. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive sample and the titer value increased 4-fold or more compared to baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Efgartigimod
5
Placebo
1
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 60 days post last dose of study drug, up to 236 days..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The study aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of efgartigimod compared to placebo in participants with post-COVID-19 postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (post-COVID-19 POTS).
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07217587 — Comparative Efficacy of Nipocalimab and Efgartigimod in Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07025330 — A Study of Efgartigimod in Patients With IgG4-Related Disease
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07072988 — Evaluate the Benefit of Corticoid Sparing in Elderly With Generalized AntiRAch Myasthenia Gravis Treated With IV or SC E
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT06528392 — Efgartigimod for Stiff Person Syndrome (ESPS)
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06860633 — Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation or Crisis With Efgartigimod
· Phase 4
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT05914649 — NC Testing in LC & POTS
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05924646 — CAlgary SAlt for POTS
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05741112 — The Long COVID-19 Wearable Device Study
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05555771 — Paediatric Syncope in the Emergency Department
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05344599 — Evaluating the Prevalence of Acute Hepatic Porphyria in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome
· active not recruiting
Other argenx trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07377396 — A Study to Assess the Safety of ARGX-124 in Healthy Volunteers
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07287982 — A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Intravenous Administration
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07284420 — ADAPT Forward 1 - ISA1 - a Study to Evaluate Empasiprubart IV as add-on Therapy to Efgartigimod IV in Participants With
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07294170 — ADAPT Forward - Master Protocol of a Platform Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Regimens in Particip
· recruiting
NCT07091630 — A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Empasiprubart in Adults With CIDP
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 9 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by argenx
Last refreshed: 23 May 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05633407.