Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05251064

Orthopaedic Surgical Wound Closure Comparison Study

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 15 June 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Suture in Incision, Surgical in 56 participants. Completed in 20 January 2022.

Timeline
23 April 2019
Primary endpoint
20 January 2022
20 January 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Virginia
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment56
Start date23 April 2019
Primary completion20 January 2022
Estimated completion20 January 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Virginia

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Incision, Surgical. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale Primary · 2-Weeks post-operative

Scores range from 0-5. Higher scores indicate better scar healing. Lower scores indicate worse scar healing

GroupValue95% CI
Suture2.8± 0.92
Adhesive Wound Closure Device4.09± 0.70
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties3.45± 1.21
Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale Primary · 3-Months post operative

Scores range from 0-5. Higher scores indicate better scar healing. Lower scores indicate worse scar healing

GroupValue95% CI
Suture2.85± 1.20
Adhesive Wound Closure Device3.82± 0.60
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties3.0± 0.89
Time to Close Secondary · During the procedure, from beginning of wound closure to the completion of wound closure

The amount of time in seconds that it took to perform closure of the incision.

GroupValue95% CI
Suture266.31± 193.59
Adhesive Wound Closure Device91.09± 39.53
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties123.27± 124.23
Length of Incision Secondary · During the procedure, obtained after incision was closed.

This is the measure in centimeters of the incision.

GroupValue95% CI
Suture9.78± 4.87
Adhesive Wound Closure Device8.23± 4.09
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties8.1± 2.78
Patient Satisfaction Secondary · 2 weeks post operative

Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction. Lower scores indicate lower patient satisfaction.

GroupValue95% CI
Suture8.33± 1.66
Adhesive Wound Closure Device8.82± 1.33
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties8.64± 1.8
Patient Satisfaction Secondary · 3 months post operative

Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction. Lower scores indicate lower patient satisfaction.

GroupValue95% CI
Suture8.11± 1.95
Adhesive Wound Closure Device8.727± 1.73
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties8.82± 1.47
Surgeon Satisfaction Secondary · Once (at application)

Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction. Lower scores indicate lower satisfaction.

GroupValue95% CI
Suture7.11± 3.62
Adhesive Wound Closure Device8.18± 2.09
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties8.0± 1.55

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 3 months.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Suture
Serious: 0/19 (0%)
Deaths: 0/19
Adhesive Wound Closure Device
Serious: 0/19 (0%)
Deaths: 0/19
Adhesive Wound Closure Device With Zip Ties
Serious: 0/18 (0%)
Deaths: 0/18
Other adverse events (2 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemSutureAdhesive Wound Closure Dev…Adhesive Wound Closure Dev…
blistersSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
cellulitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05251064 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This study is trying to find out if there is one method of surgical incision closure is better than another. The three different wound closure methods in this study are currently used in standard of care. The three methods being compared are standard stitches and the wound closure devices, Clozex, and Zipline. All of these methods are approved by the FDA.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of Adhesive Wound Closure Devices in an Orthopaedic Patient.
    Burke JF, MacLean IS, Smith JM, Hart JM, et al · · 2022 · cited 1× · PMID 36155955 · DOI 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-22-00179

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Suture

Trials testing the same drug.

Other University of Virginia trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05251064.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing