Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04951960

The Impact of Higher Positive End Expiratory Pressure on Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony

Status unknown NA Last updated 15 July 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Higher PEEP setting in Critical Illness in 10 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 November 2020
Primary endpoint
31 March 2022
31 March 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorOsaka University
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment10
Start date1 November 2020
Primary completion31 March 2022
Estimated completion31 March 2022
Sites1 location across Japan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Osaka University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Critical Illness. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Patient-ventilator asynchrony is known to frequently occur during lung protective ventilation in patients with ARDS. Previous clinical studies showed that patient-ventilator asynchrony was associated with worse outcome in ICU. Therefore, strategies to reduce patient-ventilator asynchrony need to be established promptly. Several asynchronies, e.g., breath stacking are caused by vigorous spontaneous breathing effort. Recently, the investigators' group found that higher positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduced the intensity of spontaneous breathing effort of in severe ARDS model (rabbits, pigs) and patients with ARDS. Thus, the investigators conjectured that higher PEEP may reduce the intensity of spontaneous breathing effort and thereby reduce patient-ventilator asynchrony during protective ventilation strategy, compared with lower PEEP in patients with ARDS.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Critical Illness

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Osaka University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04951960.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing