Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06826027

TAV-in-SAV in Japanese Patients

Active, enrolled Last updated 24 August 2025
What this trial tests

trial in Valve-in-valve Procedures in 180 participants. Participants enrolled and being followed up; not accepting new ones.

Timeline
7 August 2024
Primary endpoint
31 December 2025
31 March 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorOsaka University
StatusActive, enrolled
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment180
Start date7 August 2024
Primary completion31 December 2025
Estimated completion31 March 2026
Sites10 locations across Japan

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Osaka University

Who can join

Eligibility, any sex, with Valve-in-valve Procedures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Background In 2018, transcatheter aortic valve in surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) in high risk patients was approved for the treatment of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction due to aging, for which valve replacement had been selected. It has been reported that early and mid-term results of TAV-in-SAV differ depending on the sizes of the original surgical bioprosthetic valves. Especially, the prognoses of TAV-in-SAV in patients with surgical bioprosthetic valves of ≤21 mm in size are reported to be poor in the United States and Europe. Bioprosthetic valves of ≥21 mm in size are thus tended to be used also in Japan after the annular was enlarged in the initial surgery as needed. The patient group in the above-mentioned report, however, consisted of larger patients (with the mean body surface area of 1.85 m2). It has therefore been unknown whether the above report applies to smaller patients in Japan. Furthermore, in terms of the surgical results for valvular disease, not only short-term results, but also repeat surgery avoidance rate, as well as medium- and long-term results, including the occurrence rate of complications related to artificial valves, are important factors, but the characteristic of this disease, the number of cases at each facility is not that large, so there have been no comprehensive reports of TAV-in-SAV in Japan. Accordingly, the investigators will investigate TAV-in-SAV performed at Osaka University as well as multiple centers in Japan to: understand the facts; assess the appropriateness of the evaluation of the above-mentioned paper; and examine early and mid-term treatment results of TAV-in-SAV in patients with narrow bioprosthetic valves, which are specific to Japanese patients. The investigators also plan to study early and mid-term treatment results of TAV-in-SAV using a self-expanding valve because self-expanding valves generally produce favorable hemodynamics in narrow bioprosthetic valves. Study Objectives i. To study early and mid-term results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (hereinafter referred to as TAV-in-SAV). ii. To compare clinical results, including hemodynamics, of TAV-in-SAV between small aortic bioprosthetic valves (19 or 21 mm in size) and aortic bioprosthetic valves of other sizes. iii. To compare clinical results, including hemodynamics, of TAV-in-SAV between a self-expanding valve and a balloon-expandable valve. Study Methods i. Study design A multicenter, retrospective, observational study using existing data. ii. Endpoints Study endpoints are as follows: Primary endpoint: Death during the observation period The mortality among all patients registered in this study will be estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints: Analyses of major cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and factors associated with death. The rate of freedom from MACCE among all patients registered in this study will be estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with death will be explored using a Cox proportional hazards model. Hemodynamics and events including death and MACCE will also be compared between aortic bioprosthetic valves of 19 or 21 mm in size and those of other sizes. In addition, hemodynamics and events including death and MACCE will be compared between a self-expanding valve (Evolut) and a balloon-expandable valve (SAPIEN) using propensity-matching analyses.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Osaka University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06826027.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing