Adults 18 to 60, any sex, with Injection Site Irritation or Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Patient Pain ScorePrimary· following administration of a sub-induction dose of propofol, 0.5 mg/kg up to 50 mg, just prior to full induction
pain scoring system previously used by studies looking at various remedies to decrease Propofol injection pain - 0-10 with 0=no pain up to 10=worst pain imaginable
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
0.45
± 0.66
Esmolol
0.5
± 1.02
Placebo
1.83
± 1.07
Heart RateSecondary· heart rate is measured each minute for the first 10 minutes following induction
heart rate is measured as numbers on a scale with normal 60-100
Minute 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
72.6
± 12.2
Esmolol
81
± 14.25
Placebo
82
± 11.15
Minute 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
72.4
± 14.18
Esmolol
82
± 17.46
Placebo
77.2
± 11.33
Minute 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
76.9
± 13.37
Esmolol
78.4
± 13.14
Placebo
79
± 11.5
Minute 5
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
76.8
± 16.99
Esmolol
91.7
± 26.54
Placebo
83.3
± 10.89
Minute 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
77.4
± 15.62
Esmolol
84
± 10.92
Placebo
86
± 10.13
Minute 7
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
83.3
± 24.25
Esmolol
89.5
± 12.41
Placebo
84.3
± 11.76
Minute 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
75.5
± 13.43
Esmolol
83.4
± 13.8
Placebo
80.5
± 10.75
Minute 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
73.6
± 15.46
Esmolol
85.2
± 8.98
Placebo
80.8
± 8.3
Systolic Blood PressureSecondary· Systolic Blood Pressure is measured each minute for the first 10 minutes following induction
blood pressure measured in mmHg
Minute 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
122.7
± 18.15
Esmolol
126
± 26.45
Placebo
147.2
± 33.45
Minute 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
116.1
± 22.77
Esmolol
114
± 23.6
Placebo
153.3
± 31.78
Minute 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
121.6
± 12.19
Esmolol
112
± 20.52
Placebo
134.4
± 17.94
Minute 5
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
115.4
± 14.45
Esmolol
110.5
± 18.59
Placebo
123.8
± 21.47
Minute 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
117.9
± 10.31
Esmolol
138.6
± 29.79
Placebo
136.5
± 52.49
Minute 7
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
121.2
± 20.79
Esmolol
140.9
± 37.29
Placebo
128.8
± 37.33
Minute 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
113.8
± 15.52
Esmolol
127.1
± 27.54
Placebo
137
± 43.08
Minute 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
116.8
± 6.94
Esmolol
122.4
± 26.09
Placebo
126
± 29.81
Oxygen Saturation PercentageSecondary· Oxygen saturation measured each minute for the first 10 minutes following induction
oxygen saturation is measured on a percentage, with normal range \>90%
Minute 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.6
± 0.64
Esmolol
99.9
± 0.3
Placebo
99.8
± 0.37
Minute 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.6
± 0.64
Esmolol
99.89
± 0.31
Placebo
99.8
± 0.37
Minute 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.5
± 0.66
Esmolol
99.9
± 0.3
Placebo
99.8
± 0.37
Minute 5
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.2
± 1.19
Esmolol
99.9
± 0.3
Placebo
99.8
± 0.37
Minute 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.2
± 1.19
Esmolol
99.89
± 0.31
Placebo
99.2
± 0.9
Minute 7
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.2
± 1.19
Esmolol
99.7
± 0.46
Placebo
99.3
± 0.47
Minute 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
98.8
± 1.47
Esmolol
99.6
± 0.66
Placebo
99
± 1.16
Minute 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Lidocaine
99.2
± 1.19
Esmolol
99.9
± 0.31
Placebo
99.5
± 0.76
Sponsor's own description
The primary hypothesis is that esmolol and lidocaine, when given without the use of a tourniquet, provide relief of propofol injection pain that is superior to placebo when assessed using the propofol pain scoring tool
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
NCT07488832 — Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Lumbar Fusion Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07445191 — Efficacy of Triamcinolone-Lidocaine Mix in Trigger Points Injection of Masseter Muscle: Double-blinded, Randomized Contr
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07422558 — Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Lidocaine for Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06923787 — Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on the Postoperative Course and the Immune Response in Patient
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07355049 — The Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine on Emergence Agitation.
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Other Wake Forest University Health Sciences trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07474090 — Personalized Exercise Program for Survivors of Breast Cancer, STEPS-BC Trial
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07282444 — A New Way to Share Radiation Therapy Plans Between Doctors, CORRECT Trial
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06876896 — Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP) During PFA Treatment of A-fib/ A-Flutter
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07227051 — Optimizing Self-Monitoring Feedback Delivery for the Treatment of Overweight and Obesity
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07215624 — Surgical Thromboprophylaxis Practices in Oncology Patients Within the NCORP Network, STOP-VTE Study
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Last refreshed: 19 September 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04356352.