Interventional Study to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk in Women in Primary Health Care in South Croatia
CompletedNAResults postedLast updated 9 October 2020
What this trial tests
NA trial testing 60-minute lecture titled "Change of lifestyle and nutrition habits to reduce cardiovascular risk" in Cardiovascular Risk Factor in 104 participants. Completed in 1 March 2015.
Timeline
1 March 2014
Primary endpoint 1 September 2014
1 March 2015
Quick facts
Lead sponsor
University of Split, School of Medicine
Phase
NA
Status
Completed
Study type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
na
Design
single group
Masking
none
Primary purpose
prevention
Enrollment
104
Start date
1 March 2014
Primary completion
1 September 2014
Estimated completion
1 March 2015
Drugs / interventions tested
60-minute lecture titled "Change of lifestyle and nutrition habits to reduce cardiovascular risk"
Adults 45 to 60, female only, with Cardiovascular Risk Factor. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Ten Year Risk of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)Primary· Change from baseline 10-year risk of CVD at 3 months
Ten-year risk of fatal CVD was estimated using the ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association) guidelines, based on the following data collected from the study participants: age, gender, race, total and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, data about antihypertensive therapy, diabetes mellitus and smoking status.
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
2.9
2.2 – 3.6
Decisional Conflict (DC)Primary· Change from baseline DC at 3 months
DC was estimated using Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) consist of 16 items rated in a 5-point Likert-type response format, and measures individual's uncertainty toward a course of action. There are five subscales: uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support and effective decision. The scores on the total scale and subscales are calculated as a sum of items, divided by the number of items and multiplied by 25, allowing for a score range from zero (no decisional conflict) to 100 points (extreme decisional conflict). The Croatian version of the scale was previously validated.
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
27
25 – 30
State HopePrimary· Change from baseline state hope at 3 months
State hope was estimated using Integrative Hope Scale (IHS), 23-items scale, a self-rating instrument with items being rated on a six-point Likert scale from 1, strongly disagree, to 6, strongly agree. It provides an overall score and four dimension scores, obtained by summing up the individual item scores, with negative items being rated inversely. This produces possible overall hope scores ranging from 23 to 138 with higher scores representing higher hopefulness. The scores for the sub-dimensions vary according to the number of items. The Croatian version of the scale was previously validate
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
105
102 – 108
Waist CircumferenceSecondary· Change from baseline waist circumference at 3 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
89
87 – 92
Hips CircumferenceSecondary· Change from baseline hips circumference at 3 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
107
105 – 110
WeightSecondary· Change from baseline weight at 3 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants Who Received Informations About Lifestyle Change
61
54 – 68
Sponsor's own description
Patient education in lifestyle changes has a positive effect on health in individuals with cardiovascular (CV) risk Despite current positive evidence about lifestyle and dietary change in the prevention of CVD, the recommendations are still not consistently and optimally applied to women, particularly in relation to their menopausal status. More information is needed about factors that will support effective implementation of educational interventions for decreasing CV risk. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of an educational intervention, presented as a 60-minute lecture in primary health care setting about CV risk factors to women with different menopausal status, in relation to their decisional conflict about their treatment for CV risk and hope that their health will improve according to desired expectations.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Split, School of Medicine
Last refreshed: 9 October 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03863210.