Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03596983

P20 Extending Sleep to Reverse Metabolic Syndrome

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 19 November 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Sleep Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome in 44 participants. Completed in 4 June 2021.

Timeline
10 April 2019
Primary endpoint
4 June 2021
4 June 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNYU Langone Health
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment44
Start date10 April 2019
Primary completion4 June 2021
Estimated completion4 June 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

NYU Langone Health — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 35 to 60, any sex, with Metabolic Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

SASI Acceptability Questionnaire Score at Pre-Intervention Primary · Baseline

14-item questionnaire assessing acceptability of SASI. Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score is the average item score and ranges from 1-5. Higher total scores indicate greater overall acceptability.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients3.91± 0.37
SASI Acceptability Questionnaire Score at Post-Intervention Primary · Week 15

14-item questionnaire assessing acceptability of SASI. Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score is the average item score and ranges from 1-5. Higher total scores indicate greater overall acceptability.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients4.3± 0.37
Recruitment Rate Primary · Baseline

The percentage of screened participants who were enrolled in the study.

GroupValue95% CI
Screened Participants54
Retention Rate Primary · Up to Week 15

Percentage of Enrolled Participants who completed the 15-Week intervention.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients93
Protocol Adherence Rate Primary · Week 15

The percentage of participants completing greater than or equal to 4 daily sleep diary entries per week for 80% or more of the intervention period.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients99
Change in Sleep Duration Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

Data estimated using wrist actigraph.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients1.11± 1.1
Change in SAFTEE Questionnaire Scores Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

128-item questionnaire asking participants to rank the level by which they have been bothered in the past week by common physical complaints people have, such as headaches, eye irritation, nasal congestion, etc. Items ranked on 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). The total score is the average score of each item and ranges from 1-5; lower scores indicate less physical complaints. The change score is calculated as the change in scores between baseline and Week 15; the change score may range anywhere from 0-5.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients0.09± 0.17
Change in Physical Activity Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

Estimated using accelerometer (count of steps).

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients-3576.17± 16,620.33
Change in Index of Self-Regulation (Sleep) Score Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

9-item questionnaire assessing self-regulation as it pertains to sleep. Items rated on 6-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The total score is the average score for each item; higher scores indicate greater self-regulation.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients-0.16± 0.61
Change in PROMIS Fatigue 6a Morning Score Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

6-item assessment of fatigue in the morning. Lowest score - 6; Highest score - 30; Lower score indicates less fatigue in the morning.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients4.95± 5.3
Change in PROMIS Fatigue 6a Evening Score Secondary · Baseline, Week 15

6-item assessment of fatigue in the Evening. Lowest score - 6; Highest score - 30; Lower score indicates less fatigue in the evening.

GroupValue95% CI
Short Sleep Patients5.36± 5.3

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 15 Weeks. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Short Sleep Patients
Serious: 0/44 (0%)
Deaths: 0/44
Other adverse events (3 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemShort Sleep Patients
Minor skin irritation on wrist while wearing the accelerometer.General disorders
Finger InjuryGeneral disorders
Hospitalized for C-diffGastrointestinal disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03596983 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This pilot study will test the acceptability and feasibility of a sleep extension intervention in community-dwelling, short-sleeping, racially/ethnically diverse middle-aged adults with MetS. Baseline sleep habits will be assessed and used to guide individualized strategies to extend sleep. A 1-group pretest-posttest study design will test the efficacy of this 18-week study (2 weeks of baseline data collection, 1 week of study intervention planning, 12 weeks of sleep intervention delivery, final follow up 3 weeks after last day of the 12-week intervention) on sleep duration, MetS risk behaviors (reduced physical activity, increased sedentary behavior, poor diet quality), symptoms associated with MetS risk behaviors (poor affective well-being, fatigue), and self-regulation. Socio-ecological barriers and facilitators to the intervention will be identified using a quantitative and qualitative approac

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Addressing Challenges in Recruiting Diverse Populations for Research: Practical Experience From a P20 Center.
    Wright F, Malone SK, Wong A, D'Eramo Melkus G, et al · · 2022 · cited 18× · PMID 35067645 · DOI 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000577
  2. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Sleep Intervention in Adults at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome With Short Sleep Duration.
    Malone SK, Patterson F, Grunin L, Yu G, et al · · 2024 · cited 1× · PMID 37733649 · DOI 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000693
  3. Single-arm pilot study of racial differences in sleep extension intervention outcomes among middle-aged adults at risk for metabolic syndrome.
    Malone SK, Patterson F, Grunin L, Goyal C, et al · · 2026 · PMID 41528656 · DOI 10.1007/s10865-025-00624-4
  4. Association between dim light melatonin onset predicted from gene expression profiles with sleep time and chronotype preference: A pilot study.
    Malone SK, Patterson F, Hu J, Goyal C, et al · · 2025 · PMID 40844144 · DOI 10.1080/07420528.2025.2546006

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Sleep Intervention

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Metabolic Syndrome

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other NYU Langone Health trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03596983.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing