Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03591354

The International Diabetes Closed Loop (iDCL) Trial: Clinical Acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas (DCLP3 Extension)

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 31 August 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology & Dexcom G6 CGM in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in 164 participants. Completed in 9 March 2020.

Timeline
17 January 2019
Primary endpoint
28 February 2020
9 March 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Virginia
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment164
Start date17 January 2019
Primary completion28 February 2020
Estimated completion9 March 2020
Sites7 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Virginia

Who can join

14 and older, any sex, with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Time in Target Range Primary · 13 weeks

The primary exploratory outcome is time in target range 70-180 mg/dL measured by CGM comparing the randomized groups CLC vs PLGS. Results from SAP to CLC group is also included here without the primary intention of comparing to CLC vs PLGS groups.

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)67.6± 12.6
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)60.4± 17.1
SAP to CLC Group69± 11
CGM Time Above 180 Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % above 180 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)31± 13
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)38± 18
SAP to CLC Group29± 11
CGM Mean Glucose Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured mean glucose

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)160± 20
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)170± 30
SAP to CLC Group158± 17
CGM Time Below 70 Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % below 70 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)0.53± 0.34
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)0.59± 0.37
SAP to CLC Group1.76± 1.07
CGM Time Below 54 Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % below 54 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)0.20.07 – 0.48
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)0.220.06 – 0.46
SAP to CLC Group0.190.08 – 0.36
CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % in range 70-140 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)42± 12.5
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)37.1± 14.2
SAP to CLC Group45± 10
Coefficient of Variation Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM measured glucose variability measured with the coefficient of variation (CV)

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)34± 4
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)35± 5
SAP to CLC Group35± 5
Standard Deviation Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM measured glucose variability measured with the standard deviation (SD)

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)55± 12
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)60± 15
SAP to CLC Group56± 12
CGM Time Below 60 Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % below 60 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)0.430.19 – 0.97
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)0.460.17 – 0.96
SAP to CLC Group0.510.30 – 0.78
LBGI Secondary · 13 weeks

Low blood glucose index by CGM with higher index indicating higher risk of hypoglycemia. Values \<1 suggest minimal risk. Index of risk of low blood glucose excursion based on a standard formula for non-linear transformation of the blood glucose scale (Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Young-Hyman D, Schlundt D, Clarke WL: Assessment of risk for severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM: validation of the low blood glucose index. Diabetes Care 21:1870-1875, 1998)

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)0.53± 0.34
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)0.59± 0.37
SAP to CLC Group0.54± 0.24
CGM Hypoglycemia Events Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured events of at least 15 consecutive minutes \<70 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)3.01.5 – 4.9
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)3.11.6 – 5.3
SAP to CLC Group3.82.5 – 4.8
CGM Time >250 Secondary · 13 weeks

CGM-measured % \>250 mg/dL

GroupValue95% CI
Closed Loop Control (CLC)7± 6.5
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)13.6± 12.4
SAP to CLC Group7.8± 6.6

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 3 months. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Closed Loop Control (CLC)
Serious: 0/54 (0%)
Deaths: 0/54
Predictive-Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)
Serious: 0/55 (0%)
Deaths: 0/55
SAP to CLC Group
Serious: 0/55 (0%)
Deaths: 0/55
Other adverse events (1 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemClosed Loop Control (CLC)Predictive-Low Glucose Sus…SAP to CLC Group
Hyperglycemia or ketosis events without meeting criteria for Diabetic KetoacidosisEndocrine disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03591354 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This is a 3-month extension study (DCLP3 Extension) following a primary trial (DCLP3 or NCT03563313) to assess efficacy and safety of a closed loop system (t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology) in a large randomized controlled trial. Upon completion of the NIH 3-month extension study, subjects will be invited to participate in a continued use phase with Control-IQ Technology, funded by Tandem Diabetes Care, until the equipment has received FDA approval for commercial use.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Hybrid Closed-Loop Control Is Safe and Effective for People with Type 1 Diabetes Who Are at Moderate to High Risk for Hypoglycemia.
    Anderson SM, Buckingham BA, Breton MD, Robic JL, et al · · 2019 · cited 52× · PMID 31095423 · DOI 10.1089/dia.2019.0018
  2. Glucose control and psychosocial outcomes with use of automated insulin delivery for 12 to 96 weeks in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Godoi A, Reis Marques I, Padrão EMH, Mahesh A, et al · · 2023 · cited 50× · PMID 37759290 · DOI 10.1186/s13098-023-01144-4
  3. Better TIR, HbA1c, and less hypoglycemia in closed-loop insulin system in patients with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
    Jiao X, Shen Y, Chen Y. · · 2022 · cited 45× · PMID 35450868 · DOI 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002633
  4. Glycemic Outcomes of Use of CLC Versus PLGS in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Brown SA, Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, et al · · 2020 · cited 42× · PMID 32471910 · DOI 10.2337/dc20-0124
  5. Insulin Delivery and Glucose Variability Throughout the Menstrual Cycle on Closed Loop Control for Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Levy CJ, O'Malley G, Raghinaru D, Kudva YC, et al · · 2022 · cited 13× · PMID 35099294 · DOI 10.1089/dia.2021.0431

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology & Dexcom G6 CGM

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Virginia trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03591354.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing