Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03562481

Clinical Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Buffered Versus Unbuffered Local Anesthetic in Children Ages 10-12 Years

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 25 June 2020
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing 1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine in Anesthesia, Local in 26 participants. Completed in 30 June 2019.

Timeline
24 July 2018
Primary endpoint
30 June 2019
30 June 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingtriple
Primary purposeother
Enrollment26
Start date24 July 2018
Primary completion30 June 2019
Estimated completion30 June 2019
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Who can join

Adults 10 to 12, any sex, with Anesthesia, Local or Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Mean Pain Scores Following Injection Primary · Within 10 minutes of injection

Perceived pain on injection, self-reported verbally using a Likert scale from 1-10, with lower numbers corresponding to less pain (1 = "no pain," 10 = "worst pain imaginable"). Lower scores reflect a lesser degree of pain.

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic3.0± 1.9
Unbuffered Anesthetic3.3± 1.5
Mean Time to Lower Lip Numbness Following Injection Primary · Up to 30 minutes following injection

Time in minutes beginning immediately following injection to patient-reported lip numbness

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic3.4± 1.3
Unbuffered Anesthetic4.4± 3.7
Average Serum Lidocaine Concentration at 15 Minutes Post Injection Primary · One blood draw taken 15 minutes following injection

Blood Lidocaine Level (mcg/mL) as measured in 10cc venous blood, taken 15 minutes following injection. Blood assayed for serum lidocaine levels with a Sciex TripleTOF liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LC-MS) equipped with a C18 Hypersil (10mm x 2.1mm, 3.0μm).

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic243.5± 127.9
Unbuffered Anesthetic600.2± 497.0
Mean Time to Baseline Lip Sensation Primary · Within 24 hours following injection

Response in minutes from injection to when lip is no longer numb, as self reported by patient.

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic218± 59.6
Unbuffered Anesthetic241± 91.4
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) Prior to Injection Primary · 5 minutes prior to injection

Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth prior to injection

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic6
Unbuffered Anesthetic2
Buffered Anesthetic19
Unbuffered Anesthetic23
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 30 Minutes Following Injection Primary · 30 minutes following injection

Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 30 minutes following injection

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic17
Unbuffered Anesthetic18
Buffered Anesthetic8
Unbuffered Anesthetic7
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 60 Minutes Following Injection Primary · 60 minutes following injection

Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 60 minutes following injection

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic17
Unbuffered Anesthetic18
Buffered Anesthetic8
Unbuffered Anesthetic7
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 90 Minutes Following Injection Primary · 90 minutes following injection

Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 90 minutes following injection

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic15
Unbuffered Anesthetic18
Buffered Anesthetic10
Unbuffered Anesthetic7
Number of Participants Who Respond to Cold Stimulus (Positive/Negative) 120 Minutes Following Injection Primary · 120 minutes following injection

Response to experiencing sensation to cold stimulus on permanent molar tooth 120 minutes following injection

GroupValue95% CI
Buffered Anesthetic13
Unbuffered Anesthetic19
Buffered Anesthetic12
Unbuffered Anesthetic6

Sponsor's own description

Local anesthesia is an integral part of clinical pediatric dental practice, but it has challenges. It can be uncomfortable for children, and the risk of adverse events limits how much is used. Some evidence suggests benefits of buffering local anesthetics including equal effect with less pain on injection. These findings have not been replicated and validated among pediatric populations, creating a gap in the knowledge base. To address this knowledge gap and contribute to the evidence base on safety and efficacy of local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry, this investigation proposes to compare the anesthetic effects of buffered 1% lidocaine with those of unbuffered 2%, among children. The specific aims of this investigation are to determine differences between buffered 1% and unbuffered 2% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) used for inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) anesthesia, in the following domains: 1. Pain experience on injection, time to onset following the administration, and time to recovery \[subjective\] 2. Blood lidocaine levels 15 minutes following the administration and duration of pulpal anesthesia \[objective\] Null Hypotheses: 1. No difference exists in anesthetic effectiveness for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral IAN block between buffered 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as compared to unbuffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. 2. No differences exist in peak blood lidocaine levels, pain on injection, time to lip numbness, and duration of anesthesia between the two drug formulations. Randomized subjects will be injected orally for bottom jaw anesthesia, with 3cc of buffered 1% lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3cc unbuffered of 2% lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injectable volume of the buffered formulation will include 0.3cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. One faculty member in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry will administer the drugs in the Pediatric Dentistry clinic. The same clinician will administer injection to the same subjects at both visits. Clinicians and subjects will not know which drug formulation is given at which appointment. A clinician will measure the level of discomfort on injection, how long it takes for the lip to be numb, how long it takes for the first molar tooth in that area to be numb, how long it takes the local anesthetic to wear off, and how much of the anesthetic is in the blood.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Anesthesia, Local

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03562481.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing