Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03381248

Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Hyaluronic Acid to Manage Knee Pain

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 10 October 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Cooled Radiofrequency in Osteoarthritis of the Knee in 177 participants. Completed in 20 July 2020.

Timeline
7 December 2017
Primary endpoint
8 February 2019
20 July 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAvanos Medical
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment177
Start date7 December 2017
Primary completion8 February 2019
Estimated completion20 July 2020
Sites10 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Avanos Medical

Who can join

21 and older, any sex, with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Primary · Baseline to 6 month study visit

The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency54
Hyaluronic Acid Injection, Then Cooled Radiofrequency Crossover Option31
Safety: The Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up. Primary · Baseline to 12 month study visit

Safety: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency78
Hyaluronic Acid Injection48
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency38
Numeric Rating Scale Secondary · Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit

The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency43
Hyaluronic Acid Injection10
CROSSOVER From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency40
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Secondary · Baseline to 6 month study visit

The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency31.5± 23.0
Hyaluronic Acid Injection14.8± 19.4
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Secondary · Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit

The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency30.7± 25.2
Hyaluronic Acid Injection32.1± 18.3
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency18.1± 22.1
EQ-5D-5L Secondary · Baseline to 6 month study visit

The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency0.12± 0.14
Hyaluronic Acid Injection0.06± 0.15
EQ-5D-5L Secondary · Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit

The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiet

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency0.12± 0.14
Hyaluronic Acid Injection0.14± 0.14
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency0.08± 0.15
Global Perceived Effect Secondary · Baseline to 6 month study visit

Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency55
Hyaluronic Acid Injection33
Global Perceived Effect Secondary · Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit

Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency42
Hyaluronic Acid Injection8
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency39
Numeric Rating Scale Secondary · Baseline to 18 month study visit

The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency22
Numeric Rating Scale Secondary · Baseline to 24 month study visit

The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency17
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Secondary · Baseline to 18 month study visit

The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 18 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study

GroupValue95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency29.3± 25.3

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Total Study: Baseline to 24 months. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Cooled Radiofrequency
Serious: 13/89 (15%)
Deaths: 0/89
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Serious: 2/88 (2%)
Deaths: 0/88
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
Serious: 1/68 (1%)
Deaths: 0/68

Serious adverse events (12 terms)

ReactionSystemCooled RadiofrequencyHyaluronic Acid InjectionCrossover From Hyaluronic …
MusculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
CardiovascularCardiac disorders
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders
H.E.E.N.TGeneral disorders
NeurologicalNervous system disorders
GenitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders
OtherGeneral disorders
Blood/LymphaticBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Endocrine/MetabolicEndocrine disorders
ExtremitiesMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
RespiratoryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
SkinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other adverse events (11 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemCooled RadiofrequencyHyaluronic Acid InjectionCrossover From Hyaluronic …
MusculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
OtherGeneral disorders
NeurologicalNervous system disorders
CardiovascularCardiac disorders
Endocrine/MetabolicEndocrine disorders
SkinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blood/Lymphatic/InfectionBlood and lymphatic system disorders
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders
GenitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders
RespiratoryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
H.E.E.N.T / InfectionEar and labyrinth disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Musculoskeletal, Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, H.E.E.N.T, Neurological, Genitourinary, Other, Blood/Lymphatic.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03381248 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with osteoarthritis and knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) system compared to subjects receiving Hyaluronic Acid (HA). Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or HA injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-CRFA, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (HA) group will have the option to cross-over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6-month endpoint assessment. They will be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success. Subjects who were randomized to and received COOLIEF\* as their initial treatment will have the option to add 2 additional visits at 6-month intervals, representing 18 and 24 months post initial treatment.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection.
    Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, et al · · 2020 · cited 32× · PMID 32517739 · DOI 10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5
  2. The Current Status of Clinical Trials on Biologics for Cartilage Repair and Osteoarthritis Treatment: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Data.
    Zhang Z, Schon L. · · 2022 · cited 21× · PMID 35546280 · DOI 10.1177/19476035221093065
  3. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-Month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
    Lyman J, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, et al · · 2022 · cited 15× · PMID 35716058 · DOI 10.1111/papr.13139
  4. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis compared with intra-articular hyaluronan injections based on trial data.
    Desai MJ, Bentley A, Keck WA. · · 2022 · cited 8× · PMID 35610642 · DOI 10.1186/s12891-022-05445-z
  5. Nanocomposite hydrogels: benefits and attributes for osteoarthritis therapy.
    He J, Chen Y, Zhu H, Hunzla S, et al · · 2026 · PMID 41904460 · DOI 10.1186/s12967-026-08054-9

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Cooled Radiofrequency

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Avanos Medical trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03381248.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing