21 and older, any sex, with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Primary· Baseline to 6 month study visit
The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
54
Hyaluronic Acid Injection, Then Cooled Radiofrequency Crossover Option
31
Safety: The Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.Primary· Baseline to 12 month study visit
Safety: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
78
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
48
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
38
Numeric Rating ScaleSecondary· Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit
The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
43
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
10
CROSSOVER From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
40
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Secondary· Baseline to 6 month study visit
The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
31.5
± 23.0
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
14.8
± 19.4
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Secondary· Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit
The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
30.7
± 25.2
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
32.1
± 18.3
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
18.1
± 22.1
EQ-5D-5LSecondary· Baseline to 6 month study visit
The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
0.12
± 0.14
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
0.06
± 0.15
EQ-5D-5LSecondary· Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit
The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiet
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
0.12
± 0.14
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
0.14
± 0.14
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
0.08
± 0.15
Global Perceived EffectSecondary· Baseline to 6 month study visit
Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
55
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
33
Global Perceived EffectSecondary· Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit
Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
42
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
8
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
39
Numeric Rating ScaleSecondary· Baseline to 18 month study visit
The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
22
Numeric Rating ScaleSecondary· Baseline to 24 month study visit
The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
17
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Secondary· Baseline to 18 month study visit
The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 18 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study
Group
Value
95% CI
Cooled Radiofrequency
29.3
± 25.3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Total Study: Baseline to 24 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Cooled Radiofrequency
Serious: 13/89 (15%)
Deaths: 0/89
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Serious: 2/88 (2%)
Deaths: 0/88
Crossover From Hyaluronic Acid Injection to Cooled Radiofrequency
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with osteoarthritis and knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) system compared to subjects receiving Hyaluronic Acid (HA). Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or HA injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-CRFA, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (HA) group will have the option to cross-over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6-month endpoint assessment. They will be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success. Subjects who were randomized to and received COOLIEF\* as their initial treatment will have the option to add 2 additional visits at 6-month intervals, representing 18 and 24 months post initial treatment.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT04145011 — Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain
· NA
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07302204 — Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise Versus Therapeutic Exercises on Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia in Knee Osteoarthritis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06549686 — A Phase III Study of CLS2901C in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT05985785 — Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs Corticosteroid Injection
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05035810 — A Pragmatic Trial to Determine the Benefit of Behaviorally Enhanced Exercise Incentives and Corticosteroid Injections in
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT04992624 — Cannabinoid Interactions With Central and Peripheral Pain Mechanisms in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other Avanos Medical trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04145011 — Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain
· NA
· completed
NCT03601949 — Lateral Branch Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation vs. Conservative Therapy for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
· NA
· completed
NCT03368976 — PACMAN Ultrasound Recording Data Collection
· terminated
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Avanos Medical
Last refreshed: 10 October 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03381248.