Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07511764

Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Recruiting now NA Last updated 6 April 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing General Aneasthesia in Inguinal Hernia Repair in 266 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
1 December 2025
Primary endpoint
1 April 2026
1 June 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeother
Enrollment266
Start date1 December 2025
Primary completion1 April 2026
Estimated completion1 June 2026
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Who can join

Adults 1 to 10, any sex, with Inguinal Hernia Repair. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions requiring surgical intervention in childhood, with a reported lifetime prevalence of 1-4%. With the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques such as PIRS (Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing) among laparoscopic surgical procedures, perioperative anesthesia and airway management have become a critical area of clinical decision-making. The traditional approach in pediatric laparoscopic surgery is endotracheal intubation (ETT). Although ETT provides reliable airway control, it carries certain disadvantages. In contrast, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is less invasive and is associated with faster recovery. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted in recent years have shown that the LMA may be safe for ventilation in pediatric laparoscopy, reduces peak airway pressure, and shortens recovery time. No well-designed, multicenter study with an adequate sample size comparing the LMA and ETT in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery has yet been conducted. This gap limits evidence-based decision-making in a clinical setting that directly impacts practice. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare LMA and ETT in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In this regard, the study is unique and necessary from both clinical and academic perspectives for determining the optimal airway strategy in pediatric laparoscopy.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of General Aneasthesia

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07511764.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing