Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07438197: TENS-FR-VB

TENS Versus Foam Rolling for Muscle Recovery After Eccentric Exercise in Elite Female Volleyball Players

Completed NA Last updated 3 March 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in 30 participants. Completed in 30 December 2020.

Timeline
1 September 2020
Primary endpoint
1 September 2020
30 December 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Sistan and Baluchestan
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment30
Start date1 September 2020
Primary completion1 September 2020
Estimated completion30 December 2020
Sites1 location across Iran

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Sistan and Baluchestan

Who can join

Adults 18 to 28, female only, with Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) or Exercise-induced Muscle Damage. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Purpose: This study compared two recovery methods-transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and foam rolling (FR)-for muscle recovery after intense exercise in elite female volleyball players. Background: Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is common after intense training and can reduce athletic performance. TENS uses mild electrical currents applied through the skin to reduce pain and improve blood flow. Foam rolling uses a cylindrical device to apply pressure to muscles. Both methods are widely used by athletes, but no previous study has directly compared them in elite female volleyball players. Participants: Thirty elite female volleyball players from Iran's Premier League, aged 18-28 years, with at least five years of competitive experience. Procedures: Participants completed a demanding lower-body exercise protocol designed to induce muscle soreness. They were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: TENS group: received electrical stimulation to thigh muscles for 20 minutes Foam rolling group: performed self-massage with a foam roller for 20 minutes Control group: rested quietly for 20 minutes Interventions were applied 30 minutes after exercise and repeated 24 hours later. Outcomes Measured: Blood marker of muscle damage (creatine kinase \[CK\]) Vertical jump height Anaerobic sprint power Muscle soreness Measurements were taken before exercise and at 1, 24, and 48 hours afterward. Hypothesis: Both active recovery methods would reduce muscle damage markers and preserve jumping ability better than passive rest, with TENS potentially providing faster benefits.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. TENS versus foam rolling for recovery after eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage in elite female volleyball players: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.
    Shahnavazi S, Rezaeipour M, Mir A. · · 2026 · PMID 42237418 · DOI 10.1186/s13102-026-01782-x

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Trials testing the same drug.

Other University of Sistan and Baluchestan trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07438197.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing