Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07178379: HARP

Hysteroscopy Anesthesia for Relief of Pain

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 17 September 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Local paracervical Anesthesia in Pain Management in 70 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
6 September 2025
Primary endpoint
31 October 2025
31 December 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment70
Start date6 September 2025
Primary completion31 October 2025
Estimated completion31 December 2025

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba

Who can join

18 and older, female only, with Pain Management or Outpatient Hysteroscopy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of local anesthesia on pain perception in patients undergoing outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy. Although generally well tolerated, pain during hysteroscopy remains a leading cause of procedural failure and patient discomfort. Current evidence on the effectiveness of local anesthetic techniques is limited, with considerable variability in study designs, patient populations, and outcomes measured. This study will compare pain levels between two groups: one receiving local anesthetic infiltration (3% mepivacaine into the uterosacral ligaments), and the other undergoing a placebo-like intervention (saline irrigation without injection). Pain will be assessed using a standardized Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The primary objective is to determine whether local anesthesia significantly reduces pain perception during the procedure. Secondary objectives include evaluating which patient or procedural variables may influence pain (e.g., parity, uterine position, BMI, operator experience) and whether local anesthesia impacts the need for post-procedural analgesia or complication rates. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a simple randomization method. Although the study design does not allow for double blinding, efforts will be made to minimize expectation bias-patients will not be explicitly informed whether they are receiving anesthesia or not, and the placebo group will receive simulated intervention. The principal investigator and the statistician will be blinded to the treatment allocation during data analysis. Inclusion criteria are: age ≥ 18 years, indication for office-based diagnostic hysteroscopy or minor operative procedures (e.g., polypectomy or biopsy), and no previous hysteroscopy experience. Exclusion criteria include known anesthetic allergy, complex procedures (e.g., myomectomy), anatomic uterine malformations, severe complications, or lack of consent. A total sample size of 58 patients (29 per group) has been calculated based on an expected clinically relevant VAS difference of 1.5 points and a standard deviation of 2.0. To account for possible dropouts, up to 70 patients may be enrolled. The results of this trial will provide higher quality evidence on whether local anesthesia should be routinely recommended in outpatient hysteroscopy and may support cost-effectiveness studies in the future.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Pain Management

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07178379.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing