Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06723314: VISTA

Evaluation of Patient Morbidity and Root Coverage Outcomes of VISTA Versus CAF in Treating Gingival Recession

Completed NA Last updated 12 December 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Vestibular Subperiosteal Tunnel Access vista in Esthetic Zone in 30 participants. Completed in 15 October 2020.

Timeline
15 January 2018
Primary endpoint
10 January 2020
15 October 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMisr International University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment30
Start date15 January 2018
Primary completion10 January 2020
Estimated completion15 October 2020
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Misr International University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 55, any sex, with Esthetic Zone. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

To evaluate and compare Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) technique,with connective tissue graft; versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique;with connective tissue graft, in treating gingival recession in esthetic zone. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients, with Miller class I or class II gingival recession, were included in the current study, with age range from 18 to 55 years. Defects were treated using either VISTA combined with connective tissue graft technique, or CAF combined with connective tissue technique. Post-operative discomfort was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess patient morbidity. At baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months, clinical parameters were assessed; Probing Depth (PD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Gingival recession Height (GH), Keratinized Tissue Height (KTH), while Complete and Mean Root Coverage (CRC, MRC) were recorded after nine months. Results: The present study revealed that VISTA showed higher significant difference in pain.VISTA also showed a more reduction in PD, CAL, GH as well as KTH than that of CAF with no significant difference between either of the groups.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Esthetic Zone

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Misr International University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06723314.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing