Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06698393

Different Suture Diameters in Periodontal Plastic Surgery

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 21 November 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Suture 3.0 Group in Gingival Recession in 40 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
1 December 2024
Primary endpoint
31 May 2025
30 November 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorG. d'Annunzio University
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment40
Start date1 December 2024
Primary completion31 May 2025
Estimated completion30 November 2025
Sites1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

G. d'Annunzio University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Gingival Recession. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes of using non-resorbable polyamide sutures of different diameters (3.0 vs. 6.0) for securing an advanced coronary flap (CAF) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions (as classified by Cairo et al.). Forty patients presenting with at least one RT1 recession will be enrolled in the study. Twenty participants will undergo CAF + SCTG sutured with non-resorbable polyamide thread of 3.0 diameter, while the other 20 participants (control group) will receive the same procedure sutured with a 6.0 diameter thread. The primary outcome, complete root coverage (CRC), will be assessed six months after treatment. Additional clinical parameters, including gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KT), keratinized tissue thickness (GT), and Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES), will be evaluated at baseline and at the six-month follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will also be measured, including the degree of general discomfort (D) experienced, assessed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, as well as patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction (PRES) and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS), both quantified on a VAS scale from 0 to 10.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Gingival Recession

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other G. d'Annunzio University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06698393.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing