Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06624449

The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 29 November 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Cold debriefing in BLS Competence in 44 participants. Completed in 7 March 2024.

Timeline
29 August 2023
Primary endpoint
7 March 2024
7 March 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Cincinnati
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposeother
Enrollment44
Start date29 August 2023
Primary completion7 March 2024
Estimated completion7 March 2024
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Cincinnati

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with BLS Competence or Debriefing. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Basic Life Support Competence Primary · Immediately after the intervention

Competence level was measured via the American Heart Association (2020) Basic Life Support competency checklist, which is a dichotomous rating scale of 0 (not done/done incorrectly) and 1 (done correctly); there was a total of 15 points. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

Baseline Score
GroupValue95% CI
Cold Debriefing9.45± 2.93
Hot Debriefing10.04± 1.70
Post-test Score
GroupValue95% CI
Cold Debriefing14.63± 5.18
Hot Debriefing14.54± 4.5
Debriefing Experience Scale Secondary · Immediately after the intervention

The Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) (Reed, 2012) was developed to assess nursing students debriefing experience. It included 20 elements in total and was split into four subscales: (1) Analyzing Thoughts and Feelings; (2) Learning and Makin Connections; (3) Facilitator Skill in Conducting the Debriefing; and (4) Appropriate Facilitator Guidance (Reed, 2012). A Likert scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The minimum score is 20 and the maximum is 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

Total Opinion
GroupValue95% CI
Cold Debriefing95.68± 6.06
Hot Debriefing93.63± 8.06
Total Importance
GroupValue95% CI
Cold Debriefing93.86± 7.21
Hot Debriefing92.18± 9.84

Sponsor's own description

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training. The study aims to: * Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students. * Identify which debriefing method students prefer. Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing. * Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Cincinnati trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06624449.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing