Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT06288685
Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone
Phase 3 trial testing percutaneous A1 pulley release in Trigger Finger in 38 participants. Completed in 30 January 2024.
23 January 2024
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Police General Hospital, Thailand |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 38 |
| Start date | 11 October 2023 |
| Primary completion | 23 January 2024 |
| Estimated completion | 30 January 2024 |
| Sites | 1 location across Thailand |
Drugs / interventions tested
- percutaneous A1 pulley release
- Triamcinolone (TRIAMCINOLONE) — full drug profile →
Conditions studied
- Trigger Finger — all drugs for Trigger Finger →
- Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release — all drugs for Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release →
- Steroid Injection — all drugs for Steroid Injection →
- Postoperative Pain — all drugs for Postoperative Pain →
Sponsor
Police General Hospital, Thailand
Who can join
Adults 18 to 90, any sex, with Trigger Finger or Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Background: Percutaneous A1 pulley release is a cost-effective and straightforward procedure with outcomes comparable to open A1 pulley release. Postoperative pain is a prevalent concern. Corticosteroid injection is a common nonoperative treatment for trigger finger, providing favorable outcomes but associated with a notable risk of recurrence. Numerous studies have explored the combined approach of percutaneous trigger finger release with corticosteroid injection. However, to date, there is no report on early postoperative results. Objective: To conduct a comparative analysis of early postoperative outcomes between percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection and percutaneous A1 pulley release alone. Study Design \& Methods: This study constitutes a randomized controlled trial involving patients with trigger finger who underwent percutaneous release surgery from October 2023 to January 2024. A total of 38 patients were enrolled, with 18 assigned to the percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection group and 20 to the percutaneous A1 pulley release alone group. Postoperative assessments included pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), evaluation of quality of life through the QuickDASH score (qDASH), patient satisfaction, and complications.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT06288685
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Trigger Finger
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07516652 — Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Longitudinal vs. Transverse A1 Pulley Release · NA · recruiting
- NCT07256522 — Comparative Evaluation of Finger Splint, Paraffin, and Peloidotherapy Interventions in the Management of Trigger Finger · NA · recruiting
- NCT06788860 — Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Knife Release for Trigger Finger · NA · recruiting
- NCT05837286 — Conservative Treatment of Trigger Finger · NA · recruiting
- NCT05045157 — Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders · NA · recruiting
Other Police General Hospital, Thailand trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT06262932 — Effectiveness of Repeated Amiodarone Dosing Regimen Versus Standard Dosing Regimen in Atrial Fibrillation Patient With R · Phase 4 · completed
- NCT06275828 — The Effect of Perioperative and Postoperative Music Reduces Pain Perception After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruct · NA · unknown
- NCT06239038 — Does Electrocautery Increase Postoperative Pain in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty · Phase 3 · unknown
- NCT06260761 — MIPO Versus Conventional Approach in Volar Locking Plate for Close Fractures Distal End Radius Under WALANT · NA · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06288685 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Police General Hospital, Thailand
- Last refreshed: 12 March 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06288685.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing