18 and older, any sex, with Seborrheic Dermatitis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 at Week 4Primary· At end of Treatment, Week 4
Number of Participants with Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 at Week 4
IGA Scale from 0-4
Clear 0 No signs of SD
Almost Clear 1 Just perceptible erythema and just perceptible scaling
Mild 2 Mild erythema and mild scaling
Moderate 3 Moderate erythema and moderate scaling
Severe 4 Severe erythema and severe scaling
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
20
Change in Investigator Global Assessment From Baseline to Week 4Secondary· Baseline and Week 4
IGA Scale from 0-4
Clear 0 No signs of SD
Almost Clear 1 Just perceptible erythema and just perceptible scaling
Mild 2 Mild erythema and mild scaling
Moderate 3 Moderate erythema and moderate scaling
Severe 4 Severe erythema and severe scaling
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-2.16
± 0.69
Mean Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity ScoreSecondary· Baseline, Week 4, Week 6
Mean Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score from baseline and week 4, baseline a d week 6 and week 4 and week 6
SD Severity Score (the sum of the three clinical features for a total score ranging from 0-12), where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.
Scale 0-4 Erythema 0-4 Pruritus 0-4 (0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)
baseline and week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-6
± 1.61
baseline and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-2.8
± 2.96
week 4 and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
3.2
± 2.52
Mean Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for ScaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 4, and Week 6
Mean Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Scale from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6
Scale 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.
(0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)
baseline and week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-1.56
± 0.87
baseline and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-0.56
± 1.29
week 4 and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
3.2
± 2.52
Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for ErythemaSecondary· Baseline, Week 4, and Week 6
Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Erythema from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6
Erythema 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.
(0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)
baseline and week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-2
± 0.76
baseline and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-1.04
± 1.06
week 4 and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
0.96
± 0.98
Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for PruritusSecondary· Baseline Week 4, and Week 6
Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Pruritus from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6
Pruritus 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.
(0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)
baseline and week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-2.44
± 0.71
baseline and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
-1.2
± 1.12
week 4 and week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
1.24
± 0.97
Frequency of Adverse EventsSecondary· 6 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Ruxolitinib Cream
0
Healthy Control Subjects
0
Sponsor's own description
This study is an open-label prospective interventional trial that will assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. It will also attempt to characterize the molecular immune profiles of patients with SD at week 0 and week 4, with comparison to baseline profiles in healthy control subjects.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07063615 — A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of Scalp Cream for Symptom Relief and Microbiome Balance in Mild
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT05942248 — The Use of Image-Based Computer Gradings in the Analysis of Acne, Rosacea, Melasma, and Seborrheic Dermatitis
· NA
· recruiting
Other Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07094308 — The LIFT-ECHO Last Mile Project
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07291427 — Chronic Subdural Hematoma Embolization With Detachable Coils
· not yet recruiting
NCT07194187 — High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Ablation for Treatment of Prostate Tissue in Bladder Outlet Obstruction
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07260916 — Minimally Invasive Neuroendoscopic Ultra-Early Targeted ICH Evacuation
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07487948 — Safety and Biomarker Responses of Delgocitinib (JAK1,2,3/TYK2 Inhibitor) in Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia and
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Last refreshed: 6 May 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05787860.