Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05728463

Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Completed NA Last updated 7 January 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic in 1,000 participants. Completed in 2 January 2025.

Timeline
6 February 2023
Primary endpoint
2 January 2025
2 January 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment1,000
Start date6 February 2023
Primary completion2 January 2025
Estimated completion2 January 2025
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 70, any sex, with Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accepted and is nowadays considered as the gold standard treatment of gallstones disease. Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) was defined as three or four port surgery carried out with either French or American position. It reduced post-operative pain and shorten post-operative length of stay compared with open cholecystectomy in a great extent. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) as a revolutionized surgery, the main reason for its widespread use being the following: less post-operative pain, faster recovery, better cosmetics and quicker return to full activities, all resulting in the improvement of post-operative quality of life. SILC uses the umbilicus as a natural orifice allowing easy access to peritoneal cavity, easy conversion to standard laparoscopy and its easy closure, has been widely introduced into the clinical practice for benign gallbladder diseases. SILC can easily hide the surgical scar inside the umbilicus, thus has better cosmetic effect. But the real clinical benefits for patients still remain a matter of debate. In the last 5 years, many studies on SILC have been published, trying to answer the question whether such a new approach is worthwhile or not and whether is safe and cost-effective.Based on the above controversy, we conduct a RCT comparing clinical and peri-operative outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL), of SILC and CLC with the intent to assess the actual indications of the single-incision approach.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05728463.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing