18 and older, male only, with Gonorrhea or Chlamydia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants Testing for Gonorrhea and ChlamydiaPrimary· During enrollment visit
Defined as the number of eligible participants who accepted and provided laboratory samples for gonorrhea and chlamydia PCR testing out of the total number of eligible participants recruited across the three study arms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
390
Standard Pay-It-Forward
361
Control
12
Donation AmountSecondary· Baseline
The response was defined as the total amount of money donated by participants in the pay-it-forward group to support testing for other participants. Self-reported via a self-administered survey and validated in donation receipt records.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
225.16
± 37.53
Standard Pay-It-Forward
382.61
± 63.77
Number of Participants Who Test Positive for GonorrheaSecondary· Within 2 weeks of enrollment
The response rate was defined as the number of participants who tested positive for gonorrhea out of the total number of participants tested for gonorrhea. Test results were obtained from validated laboratory diagnosis reports based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
10
Standard Pay-It-Forward
12
Control
1
Number of Participants Who Test Positive for ChlamydiaSecondary· Within 2 weeks of recruitment
The response rate was defined as the number of participants who tested positive for chlamydia out of the total number of participants who tested for chlamydia. Test results were obtained from validated laboratory diagnosis reports based on PCR testing.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
35
Standard Pay-It-Forward
58
Control
0
Cost Per Test Per IndividualSecondary· Baseline - During enrollment visit
The costs per test individual consist of the direct costs of PCR tests for gonorrhea and chlamydia for each individual tested at baseline. For the intervention arms, the estimate was calculated as the total direct cost paid to the laboratory minus the total amount donated by pay-it-forward arm participants in that intervention arm, divided by the total number of participants tested in that arm. The average exchange rate for the US dollar (USD) to RMB on March 31, 2025, was 1 USD = 7.22 RMB.
Control arm participants paid the standard cost of 150 RMB (\~20.18 USD) each for dual PCR testing at t
Group
Value
95% CI
Community Engaged Pay-it-forward
14.10
± 0.41
Standard Pay-it-forward
13.61
± 0.75
Control Arm
20.18
± 0
Mean Self Reported Gratitude ScoreSecondary· During enrollment visit
The response rate was the average self-rated gratitude towards and about the pay-it-forward intervention. This was scored using a 10-item adapted gratitude survey on a 5-level Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Possible average scores ranged from 1 (lowest level of gratitude) to 7 (highest level of gratitude).
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
5.81
± 1.04
Standard Pay-It-Forward
6.21
± 0.84
Mean Self Reported Community Engagement ScoreSecondary· Baseline
The response rate was the average self-rated community engagement with the local and/or LGBTQ community before participating in the study, scored using a validated tool assessed on a 6-item Likert scale. Possible average scores ranged from 0 (no community engagement) to 6 (high community engagement)
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
0.21
± 0.29
Standard Pay-It-Forward
0.27
± 0.31
Control
0.32
± 0.34
Mean Community Connectedness and Cohesion ScoreSecondary· Baseline
The response rate was defined as the average self-rated community engagement score using a validated 11-item scale rated on a 4-level Likert scale. Possible average scores ranged from 1 (low community connectedness and cohesion) to 4 (high community connectedness and cohesion)
Group
Value
95% CI
Community Engaged Pay-it-forward
3.27
± 0.67
Standard Pay-it-forward
3.02
± 0.72
Control Arm
2.66
± 0.83
Internalized Homophobia and Self-identificationSecondary· Baseline
The response rate was the average self-rated internalized homophobia and self-identification score assessed using a validated 9-item survey rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. Possible average scores ranged from 1 (low self-identification and high internalized homophobia) to 5 (high self-identification and low internalized homophobia)
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-Engaged Pay-It-Forward
3.61
± 0.89
Standard Pay-It-Forward
3.34
± 0.95
Control
3.44
± 0.84
Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing Uptake by Clinic TypeSecondary· During enrollment visit
Stratifies gonorrhea/chlamydia testing uptake between participants recruited in community-led clinics versus public STI clinics across the three intervention arms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
199
Standard Pay-It-Forward
164
Control
1
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
191
Standard Pay-It-Forward
197
Control
11
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
10
Standard Pay-It-Forward
39
Control
388
Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing Uptake by Sexual OrientationSecondary· During enrollment visit
Stratifies gonorrhea/chlamydia testing uptake between MSM and non-MSM participants across the three intervention arms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
194
Standard Pay-It-Forward
193
Control
1
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
196
Standard Pay-It-Forward
168
Control
11
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
10
Standard Pay-It-Forward
39
Control
388
Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing Uptake by Age GroupSecondary· During enrollment visit
Stratifies gonorrhea/chlamydia testing uptake between participants aged 30 years and below and those above 30 years across the three intervention arms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
143
Standard Pay-It-Forward
178
Control
4
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
247
Standard Pay-It-Forward
183
Control
8
Community-engaged Pay-It-Forward
10
Standard Pay-It-Forward
39
Control
388
Sponsor's own description
PIONEER is a three-arm, programmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare effectiveness of three implementation strategies, followed by a mixed-methods implementation evaluation study
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06738407 — Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT07397403 — The Efficacy of Doxycycline Post Exposure Prophylaxis for Preventing STIs Among MSM in Bangkok, Thailand.
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT06951438 — Assessing Acceptability and Feasibiity of STI Self-swab Testing, to be Offered at the Time of Telemed Medication Abortio
· NA
· recruiting
Other University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill trials
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Last refreshed: 3 December 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05723263.