Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05600543: LombaMob
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
NA trial testing Lumbar belt in Low Back Pain in 28 participants. Completed in 29 March 2024.
29 March 2024
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Thuasne |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | non randomized |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 28 |
| Start date | 30 September 2022 |
| Primary completion | 29 March 2024 |
| Estimated completion | 29 March 2024 |
| Sites | 1 location across France |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Lumbar belt
- Lombaskin lumbar belt and the Lyne Up percko postural T-shirt.
Conditions studied
- Low Back Pain — all drugs for Low Back Pain →
Sponsor
Thuasne
Who can join
Adults 18 to 70, any sex, with Low Back Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition worldwide as the lifetime prevalence is up to 80%. It is defined as pain in the lumbosacral region in which the etiological causes are most often mechanical, and it is therefore defined as "non-specific LBP". Lumbar belts are used in the treatment and secondary prevention of LBP. They are supposed to reduce the intensity of pain by improving the functional capacities of daily activities and thus preventing the risk of chronicity related to immobility (HAS). Despite some proof of their efficiency in the literature, it is still not clear how the pressure applied by the belt and the immobilization constraints on the trunk improve the patient mobility. Considering that LBP causes movement limitation, and that the lumbar belt contributes to initially decrease the pain intensity, as well as to improve the mobility and the functional capacities of the patient, we propose to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical effects of the lumbar belt during different trunk movements in subjects with and without LBP. This is a clinical investigation on a CE marked medical device, used in accordance with its intended purpose, in the context of a post-marketing clinical follow-up with additional non-invasive procedures (IC SCAC: case 4.1 of the medical device regulation 2017/745).This is a prospective, monocentric, comparative and open clinical investigation. The objective is to evaluate the clinical and functional effects related to spinal movements in 2 conditions, with and without the wearing of a lumbar belt. The study will be carried out with two groups of subjects: one group of subjects presenting an episode of LBP (NS\>4) (subjects considered to have subacute or chronic nonspecific LBP according to the classification of LBP) and another group of control subjects with no spinal symptoms and no pain that could limit movement (healthy subjects). Each group will undergo 2 visits on 2 separate days with a 30-day delay for the LBP subjects and a 7-day delay for the healthy subjects * a first visit (V1) for inclusion, familiarization with a clinical and functional test, and an external measurement of spinal mobility during movements; * a second visit (V2) for a clinical and functional evaluation, external measurements of spinal mobility and biomechanical measurements. A third visit (V3) will be offered to healthy subjects for the measurement of spinal segment kinematics with the LombaSkin belt and Percko postural T-shirt.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05600543
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Low Back Pain
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07526012 — Comparative Effects Of Post Isometric Relaxation Versus Active Isolated Stretch In Patients With Piriformis Syndrome · NA · recruiting
- NCT07535047 — Placebo-Induced Hypoalgesia During Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Application in Low Back Pain · NA · recruiting
- NCT07463729 — Evaluation of Stabilization Training With Biofeedback in Lumbosacral Spine Pain Syndrome · NA · recruiting
- NCT07250568 — Office Program Effects on Pain, Posture, Muscle Physiology, Stress, Ergonomics, and Quality of Life in LBP Workers · NA · recruiting
- NCT07467070 — Effectiveness of Pilates on Postural Correction, Core Strength and Flexibility in Younger Individuals With Non-specific · NA · recruiting
Other Thuasne trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07125092 — A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Benefit and Safety of Medical Compression Garments in the Management of Patients With L · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT06264817 — Auto-Adjustable MOBIDERm Autofit Armsleeve in the Management of Upper Limb Lymphedema. · NA · recruiting
- NCT05905809 — Efficacy of UniRelieverTM Offloading Brace in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis · NA · completed
- NCT05716165 — Effect of Proprioceptive Knee Braces on the Performance and Endurance of Recreational Soccer Players Aged 60-80 Years · NA · completed
- NCT05435040 — Evaluation of Proprioceptive Abilities While Wearing an Elastic Orthosis in Patients With Proprioceptive Knee Deficits · NA · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05600543 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Thuasne
- Last refreshed: 10 April 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05600543.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing