Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05557032
Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
trial testing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in 536 participants. Completed in 16 September 2022.
15 September 2022
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Izmir Katip Celebi University |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 536 |
| Start date | 25 December 2021 |
| Primary completion | 15 September 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 16 September 2022 |
| Sites | 1 location across Turkey (Türkiye) |
Drugs / interventions tested
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Conditions studied
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation — all drugs for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation →
Sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Who can join
Adults 18 to 100, any sex, with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds. All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all. The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05557032
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other trials of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Trials testing the same drug.
- NCT03654859 — Silesian Registry of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests · unknown
Other recruiting trials for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT06552299 — Evaluating Length and Depth Estimation Accuracy of Laypersons and Health-Care Providers · NA · recruiting
- NCT05917717 — Cardiac Arrest Bundle of cARE Trial · NA · recruiting
- NCT05321459 — Predictive Outcome in Comatose Patients · recruiting
- NCT05173740 — Rehabilitation for Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest · Phase 4 · recruiting
- NCT03981107 — Compression Only CPR Versus Standard CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - A Randomized Survival Study · NA · recruiting
Other Izmir Katip Celebi University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07460479 — Pilot Study of an Extended CBT Group Intervention for Intolerance of Uncertainty · NA · recruiting
- NCT07453277 — Blood-Based Molecular Clock Biomarkers Predict Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset: A Prospective Observational Study · active not recruiting
- NCT07341646 — Effect of Cuff Pressure Assessment Methods on Postoperative Complications in Breast Surgery · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07304661 — Comparison of PPV and LVOT VTI During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness · not yet recruiting
- NCT07304648 — Role of End-Tidal CO2 During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in ICU · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05557032 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Last refreshed: 22 September 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05557032.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing