Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07304661

Comparison of PPV and LVOT VTI During Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness

Not yet recruiting Last updated 26 December 2025
What this trial tests

trial in Hemodynamic Instability in 48 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
1 January 2026
Primary endpoint
1 January 2027
1 June 2027

Quick facts

Lead sponsorIzmir Katip Celebi University
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment48
Start date1 January 2026
Primary completion1 January 2027
Estimated completion1 June 2027
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Hemodynamic Instability or Hypovolemia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Hemodynamic instability remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients in intensive care units. One major contributor to this instability is intravascular fluid deficit. Although fluid administration is often preferred as an initial intervention, inaccurate estimation of fluid requirements carries significant risks. Inadequate resuscitation may lead to tissue hypoperfusion and organ dysfunction, whereas excessive fluid loading is associated with pulmonary edema, increased intra-abdominal pressure, multi-organ dysfunction, and increased mortality. Consequently, reliable prediction of fluid responsiveness is considered a critical determinant in modern intensive care management. The limited reliability of static parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness and the fact that PPV retains its validity only under specific clinical conditions highlight the need for more effective methods. In recent years, hemodynamic changes assessed during the passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver have gained prominence; particularly, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI)-based cardiac output measurements have been identified as a strong parameter for predicting fluid responsiveness . Moreover, changes in pulse pressure variation (PPV) during PLR have also been reported as a potential predictor; however, the number of studies prospectively comparing PPV variation and LVOT VTI-based cardiac output change within the same patient population remains limited . Therefore, the proposed study aims to fill this gap in the literature and contribute to fluid management in the intensive care setting. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of PPV variation and LVOT VTI-based cardiac output change after the PLR maneuver in predicting fluid responsiveness among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, and to determine the diagnostic value of both methods. The findings of the present study are expected to support more reliable decision-making in fluid therapy and provide clinical evidence toward the individualization of fluid management in intensive care practice.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Hemodynamic Instability

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Izmir Katip Celebi University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07304661.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing