18 and older, any sex, with Major Depressive Disorder. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Drop-Out RatesPrimary· assessed at end-of-treatment (week 8)
To determine feasibility, we will report rates of and reasons for participant dropout from the trial.
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
2
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
26
Change in Patient Satisfaction (as Measured by the CSQ-8)Primary· Measured at midpoint (week 4) and end-of-treatment (week 8)
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire which assesses the satisfaction with clinical services received. Each item uses a 4-point Likert scale. Items are summed for a total score ranging from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
26.3
± 4.0
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
27.2
± 3.3
Change in Treatment Credibility (as Measured by the CEQ)Primary· Change in credibility from baseline (week 0) to midpoint (week 4)
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) is a 6-item, self-report questionnaire. Items 1-3 assess clients' impressions of the treatment credibility; they are scored on Likert scales ranging from 1 to 9 (e.g., from 1='not at all' to 9='very much'). Items are summed for a total score that can range from 3 to 27, where higher scores mean greater treatment credibility.
Week 0
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
18.9
± 3.1
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
19.3
± 3.8
Change in Outcome Expectancy (as Measured by the CEQ)Primary· Measured at baseline (week 0) and midpoint (week 4)
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) is a 6-item, self-report questionnaire. Items 4-6 are used to assess clients' outcome expectancy. Item 5 is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 9 (where 1='not at all' to 9='very much'). Items 4 and 6 are scored on a scale from 0% to 100% (in 10-point increments); their scores are then converted linearly on a Likert scale from 1 to 9. Items are summed together for a total outcome expectancy score that can range from 3 to 27, where higher scores mean a higher outcome expectancy.
Week 0
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
13.8
± 3.3
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
15.0
± 5.4
App Rating (as Measured by the uMARS)Primary· Measured at endpoint (week 8)
The Mobile Application Rating Scale user version (uMARS) is a self-report form with 26 items that assess participant's evaluations of various app features. Dimensions of this measure include engagement (5 items), functionality (4 items), aesthetics (3 items), information quality (4 items); other items about app subjectivity quality (4 items) and perceived impact (6 items) are also available but do not contribute to the overall score (and are not reported here). Items are rated on differently worded 5-point Likert scales ranging from 1 (Inadequate) to 5 (Excellent). An overall app rating score
Engagement
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
3.6
± 0.6
Functionality
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
4.5
± 0.6
Aesthetics
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
4.6
± 0.5
Information quality
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
4.6
± 0.4
Overall app rating score
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
4.3
± 0.4
Change in Treatment UtilizationPrimary· Measured at midpoint (week 4) and end-of-treatment (week 8)
Treatment utilization was assessed with a single question: "On average, how much time (in minutes) do you spend using the app or practicing skills from the app in total, per week?" Answers were collected as number of minutes in integer format, where more time spent on and off the app was interpreted as greater treatment utilization.
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
50
30 – 60
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
60
30 – 90
Change in MDD Symptom Severity (as Measured by the HAM-D)Secondary· Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is the gold-standard clinician-administered assessment of depression symptom severity. It contains 21 items that are rated on a mixture of 3- and 5-point Likert scales. The first 17 items are summed for the total score, which can range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Week 0
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
19.1
± 5.0
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
15.0
± 6.1
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
10.8
± 6.1
Week 20
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
9.8
± 7.8
Change in Functional Impairment (as Measured by the WSAS)Secondary· Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a self-report measure that assesses impairment in occupational, social, and family areas. The WSAS is a 5-item measure that uses 9-point Likert scales ranging from 0 (no impairment at all) to 8 (very severe impairment). The items are summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 40, where higher scores mean higher functional impairment.
Week 0
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
23.1
± 7.8
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
18.6
± 7.9
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
13.0
± 7.7
Week 20
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
12.3
± 9.1
Change in Quality of Life (as Measured by the Q-LES-Q-SF)Secondary· Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment), week 20 (follow-up)
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a 16-item, self-report questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction over the past week. Each question is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Questions 1-15 are then summed to a total score, and the total score is reported as a percentage maximum possible, such that the final percent score range is 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Week 0
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
40.9
± 11.4
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
52.4
± 13.1
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
62.9
± 13.5
Week 20
Group
Value
95% CI
Therapist-guided Smartphone-delivered CBT
63.6
± 14.3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse event data was collected during study assessments at week 4, week 8, and the 3-month follow-up. At these assessments, participants were probed for adverse events that occurred since the last adverse event assessment..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
We are testing a smartphone app that provides therapy for depression. Participants will also receive short weekly virtual appointments with a therapist. Researchers want to know if this new treatment is usable, whether participants are satisfied with it, and whether it can help lower symptoms.
Publications & conference data
3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07219394 — Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation in a CCBHC
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06705478 — Pramipexole Versus Escitalopram to Treat Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Comorbid MDD With Mild Neurocognitive Disor
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06749392 — An Individual-specific Synchrony Signature
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07316803 — Group Intervention for Romantic Relationships in Young Adults With Severe Mental Illness
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07242105 — Optimizing Brain Excitability in Depression
· NA
· recruiting
Other Massachusetts General Hospital trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT03585946 — Outcomes in Stevens Johnsons Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
· withdrawn
NCT07214831 — A Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Large Language Model-based Chatbot for Brief Alcohol Intervention Among Emerg
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06686901 — A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Smartphone Delivered Treatment for Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT05854212 — Behavioral Economics to Implement Nutrition Ranking in Food Pantries
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07323446 — The MIND Study: The MGH/MIT Investigation of NAC on Dysregulation
· EARLY_PHASE1
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Massachusetts General Hospital
Last refreshed: 28 May 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05386329.