Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05305586

Comparison of Two Types of Splints to Treat Dental Luxation Injuries

Completed NA Last updated 11 September 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Splint retained by Bulk-fill flowable in Dental Trauma in 88 participants. Completed in 4 May 2020.

Timeline
9 July 2019
Primary endpoint
20 April 2020
4 May 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorDow University of Health Sciences
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment88
Start date9 July 2019
Primary completion20 April 2020
Estimated completion4 May 2020
Sites1 location across Pakistan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Dow University of Health Sciences

Who can join

Adults 16 to 50, any sex, with Dental Trauma or Splints. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The objectives of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) were: 1. To compare the efficiency of splinting by two composite materials in terms of retention of material 2. To compare adhesive point dimension between the two groups 3. To compare time taken to place and remove the splint 4. To assess the efficacy of bulkfill flowable in reducing mobility of luxated teeth.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Dental Trauma

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Dow University of Health Sciences trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05305586.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing