Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05203185

Nudging Provider Adoption of Clinical Decision Support

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 26 June 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Pulmonary Embolism Risk Kalculator (PERK) in Pulmonary Embolism in 1,612 participants. Completed in 30 April 2022.

Timeline
1 July 2021
Primary endpoint
30 April 2022
30 April 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNYU Langone Health
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposehealth services research
Enrollment1,612
Start date1 July 2021
Primary completion30 April 2022
Estimated completion30 April 2022
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

NYU Langone Health — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 25 to 70, any sex, with Pulmonary Embolism. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Patient Visits Where the Provider Adopted the Pulmonary Embolism Risk Kalculator (PERK) Tool Primary · Up to Month 6

The tool is considered adopted during a patient visit if the provider accepted the recommendation given by the PERK tool (i.e., a D-dimer was recommended and ordered or a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was recommended and ordered). This outcome measure is assessed using electronic health record (EHR) data from the patient visit.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Site - Patients and Providers39.11
No Intervention Site - Patients and Providers20.66
Percentage of PE-Designated CTPA Tests That Are Positive for PE Secondary · Up to Month 6

Monitored using EHR reporting data. Calculated as the percentage of CTPA tests ordered to evaluate for PE that are positive for PE.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Site - Patients and Providers26.45
No Intervention Site - Patients and Providers10.76

Sponsor's own description

The central hypothesis of this proposal is that the addition of a theory-informed "nudge" to a clinical decision support (CDS) tool will address identified behavioral barriers to use and significantly improve adoption by providers. Nudges are applications of behavioral science, defined as positive reinforcement and indirect suggestions that have a non-forced effect on decision making. This study will use a behavioral theory-informed process to develop a new CDS tool that includes a nudge that addresses barriers to adoption.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Effect of a behavioral nudge on adoption of an electronic health record-agnostic pulmonary embolism risk prediction tool: a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial.
    Richardson S, Dauber-Decker KL, Solomon J, Seelamneni P, et al · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 39091509 · DOI 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae064

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Pulmonary Embolism

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other NYU Langone Health trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05203185.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing