Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05192941: V-DIFFERENCE

Study of Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Quality of Life of Inclisiran (KJX839) vs Placebo, on Top of Ongoing Individually Optimized Lipid-lowering Therapy, in Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 14 April 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Inclisiran Sodium in Hypercholesterolemia in 1,770 participants. Completed in 19 March 2025.

Timeline
8 April 2022
Primary endpoint
11 June 2024
19 March 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNovartis Pharmaceuticals
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingquadruple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment1,770
Start date8 April 2022
Primary completion11 June 2024
Estimated completion19 March 2025
Sites136 locations across France, Estonia, Germany, Poland, Bulgaria, Latvia, Spain, Czechia

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Hypercholesterolemia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants Achieving Individual LDL-C Target (<55 mg/dL or <70 mg/dL) Primary · Day 90

Number of participants achieving individual Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) target (\< 55 mg/dL or \< 70 mg/dL) at Day 90. The individual LDL-C target of the participants was determined according to their most recent individual cardiovascular risk category. A larger proportion of participants indicates a superior outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran752
Placebo266
Relative Change From Baseline to Mean LDL-C Level Over the Double-blind Treatment Period Secondary · Baseline to Day 360

Relative (percentage) change from baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) level averaged over the double-blind treatment period

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran-59.45-60.79 – -58.11
Placebo-24.31-25.68 – -22.93
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Muscle-related Adverse Event From Day 1 to Day 360 Secondary · Day 1 to Day 360

The number of participants who experienced at least one muscle-related adverse event, defined as Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) rhabdomyolysis / myopathy from Day 1 to Day 360. All muscle-related adverse events occurring between first dose of double-blind treatment and earliest date out of visit Day 360, death date and last contact date are considered.

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran107
Placebo167
Number of Participants Experiencing Self-reported Pain Secondary · Day 1 to Day 360

Self-reported pain is reported at its worst in the last 24 h on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Days with a score of 0 are considered as days without pain. The percentage of days with pain for each participant is calculated as number of days with pain divided by the total number of days where diary was completed, multiplied by 100. Diary data between the first dose of double-blind treatment up to the minimum of last contact date and Day 360 visit are considered.

Percentage of days with pain: 0%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran143
Placebo98
Percentage of days with pain: >0-20%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran189
Placebo177
Percentage of days with pain: >20-40%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran45
Placebo71
Percentage of days with pain: >40-60%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran60
Placebo44
Percentage of days with pain: >60-80%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran48
Placebo48
Percentage of days with pain: >80%
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran409
Placebo432
Percentage of days with pain: Missing
GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran4
Placebo2
Annualized Number of Days With Pain Secondary · Day 1 to Day 360

Annualized rate refers to the estimated number of days with pain per year. Self-reported pain is reported at its worst in the last 24 h on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Days with a score of 0 are considered as days without pain.

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran198.63180.46 – 218.62
Placebo214.51194.63 – 236.42
Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Severity Score Over the Double-blind Treatment Period Secondary · Baseline to Day 360

The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete. The pain severity score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 4 items in the pain severity domain (questionnaire items number 3, 4, 5, 6). The derived pain severity score ranged between 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), with larger values indicatin

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran-0.21-0.30 – -0.13
Placebo-0.10-0.19 – -0.02
Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Interference Score Over the Double-blind Treatment Period Secondary · Baseline to Day 360

The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete. The pain interference score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 7 items in the pain interference domain (questionnaire items number 9A through 9G). The derived pain interference score ranged between 0 (does not interfere) and 10 (completely interferes), with larger

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran-0.06-0.14 – 0.02
Placebo0.05-0.03 – 0.13
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Change in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Severity Score From Baseline to Day 360. Secondary · Baseline to Day 360

The Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete. The pain severity score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 4 items in the pain severity domain (questionnaire items number 3, 4, 5, 6). The derived pain severity score ranged between 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), with larger values indicatin

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran123
Placebo104
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Change in Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Pain Interference Score From Baseline to Day 360 Secondary · Baseline to Day 360

The SF-BPI is a self-administered standardized fifteen items questionnaire that assesses how pain interferes with or influences a participant's life. The query period covers the past 24 hours and takes 5 minutes for the participant to complete. The pain interference score was derived for each visit between screening and EOT/EOS (Day 360) as the average over the 7 items in the pain interference domain (questionnaire items number 9A through 9G). The derived pain interference score ranged between 0 (does not interfere) and 10 (completely interferes), with larger values indicating a higher level

GroupValue95% CI
Inclisiran87
Placebo70

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in the clinical database from first dose of study treatment until the study completion visit, up to a planned maximum duration of 360 days.. Reporting threshold: 1.999%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Inclisiran
Serious: 148/900 (16%)
Deaths: 6/900
Placebo
Serious: 148/870 (17%)
Deaths: 5/870
Total
Serious: 296/1770 (17%)
Deaths: 11/1770

Serious adverse events (229 terms)

ReactionSystemInclisiranPlaceboTotal
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
Angina unstableCardiac disorders
COVID-19Infections and infestations
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
Chest painGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders
SyncopeNervous system disorders
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders
Aortic aneurysmVascular disorders
Atrioventricular blockCardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders
Spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other adverse events (23 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemInclisiranPlaceboTotal
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
COVID-19Infections and infestations
Diabetes mellitus inadequate controlMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
BronchitisInfections and infestations
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
InfluenzaInfections and infestations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations
HeadacheNervous system disorders
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increasedInvestigations

Most-reported serious reactions: Atrial fibrillation, Osteoarthritis, Angina pectoris, Peripheral arterial occlusive disease, Coronary artery disease, Pneumonia, Angina unstable, COVID-19.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05192941 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Study of efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life of inclisiran (KJX839) vs placebo, on top of ongoing individually optimized lipid-lowering therapy, in participants with hypercholesterolemia

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9): from bench to bedside.
    Bao X, Liang Y, Chang H, Cai T, et al · · 2024 · cited 101× · PMID 38185721 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-023-01690-3
  2. Inclisiran, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Lipoprotein (a).
    Katsiki N, Vrablik M, Banach M, Gouni-Berthold I. · · 2023 · cited 50× · PMID 37111334 · DOI 10.3390/ph16040577
  3. Clinical potential of inclisiran for patients with a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
    Nishikido T. · · 2023 · cited 28× · PMID 36717882 · DOI 10.1186/s12933-023-01752-4
  4. Development of Novel siRNA Therapeutics: A Review with a Focus on Inclisiran for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia.
    Ebenezer O, Comoglio P, Wong GK, Tuszynski JA. · · 2023 · cited 21× · PMID 36835426 · DOI 10.3390/ijms24044019
  5. Current RNA strategies in treating cardiovascular diseases.
    Chia SPS, Pang JKS, Soh BS. · · 2024 · cited 13× · PMID 38291757 · DOI 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.01.028
  6. RNA interference therapy in cardiology: will new targets improve therapeutic goals?
    Fazoli RT, Drager LF, Kalil-Filho R, Generoso G. · · 2024 · cited 4× · PMID 39188988 · DOI 10.7573/dic.2024-3-1
  7. Inclisiran-based treatment strategy in hypercholesterolaemia: the VICTORION-Difference trial.
    Landmesser U, Laufs U, Schatz U, Winzer EB, et al · · 2025 · cited 2× · PMID 40884558 · DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf685
  8. Design and rationale of the VICTORION-Difference study: A phase 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess inclisiran's early efficacy, safety, tolerability, as well as its impact on quality of life in individuals with hypercholesterolemia.
    Landmesser U, Laufs U, Schatz U, Winzer EB, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40436308 · DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.05.014

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Inclisiran Sodium

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Hypercholesterolemia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Novartis Pharmaceuticals trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05192941.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing