Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05138757

Pinpoint Trial: Prebiotics IN Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy

Completed Phase 1, PHASE2 Results posted Last updated 9 March 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 1, PHASE2 trial testing Prebiotic in Peanut Allergy in 20 participants. Completed in 12 March 2025.

Timeline
30 November 2021
Primary endpoint
12 March 2025
12 March 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Chicago
PhasePhase 1, PHASE2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designsingle group
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment20
Start date30 November 2021
Primary completion12 March 2025
Estimated completion12 March 2025
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Chicago

Who can join

Adults 4 to 17, any sex, with Peanut Allergy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

The Proportion of Subjects Mildly Symptomatic or Less at the 12 Month DBPCFC Primary · At the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

To determine the proportion of subjects who met the primary endpoint by tolerating at least 2044 mg cumulative peanut protein with no more than mild symptoms during the 12-month DBPCFC.

GroupValue95% CI
Fiber4
Placebo4
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Dose Related GI Side Effects During Oral Immunotherapy Secondary · From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.

• To determine the proportion of subjects who experience dose related GI side effects during oral immunotherapy.

GroupValue95% CI
Fiber4
Placebo7
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hypersensitivity Reactions (Other Than GI) During Oral Immunotherapy Secondary · From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.

• To determine the proportion of subjects who experience hypersensitivity reactions (other than GI) during oral immunotherapy

GroupValue95% CI
Fiber3
Placebo5
Fecal Butyrate Concentration (mM) Secondary · At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

Fecal samples were collected at each study time point and analyzed for butyrate concentration using metabolomic profiling. Results are reported in millimolar (mM).

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber18.45± 12.25
Placebo21.02± 13.47
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber15.64± 12.30
Placebo15.94± 9.98
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber20.80± 24.15
Placebo18.55± 21.52
Change from baseline (week 4)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber-5.93± 17.67
Placebo-6.37± 15.31
Change from baseline (week 16)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber-1.51± 21.42
Placebo-3.31± 25.29
Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels Secondary · At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

• To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber17.31± 18.93
Placebo69.34± 41.58
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber25.21± 32.31
Placebo73.55± 39.94
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber12.47± 18.90
Placebo57.72± 38.17
Change from baseline (visit 4)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber7.89± 18.86
Placebo4.21± 17.03
Change from baseline (visit 16)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber-2.01± 3.12
Placebo-10.85± 28.61
Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) Levels Secondary · At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

• To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber0.41± 0.20
Placebo1.58± 1.98
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber0.57± 0.40
Placebo2.21± 3.33
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber2.20± 2.25
Placebo8.31± 8.78
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber0.09± 0.20
Placebo0.54± 1.30
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber1.84± 2.23
Placebo8.61± 8.81
Change in Peanut Skin Prick Test Mean Wheal Diameter Secondary · At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

• To determine if a change exists in peanut skin prick test mean wheal diameter

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber15.00± 5.07
Placebo16.73± 11.16
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber18.67± 18.84
Placebo18.00± 14.12
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber5.20± 3.63
Placebo6.78± 3.70
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber3.67± 15.26
Placebo1.27± 16.20
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber-12.80± 3.27
Placebo-11.89± 8.97
Change in Peanut Component Levels Secondary · At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

• To determine if a change exists in peanut component levels (peanut Ara h 2)

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber12.91± 19.01
Placebo59.43± 40.20
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber22.62± 33.86
Placebo66.61± 39.97
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber13.99± 27.97
Placebo45.41± 33.79
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber9.71± 26.81
Placebo7.18± 13.57
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)
GroupValue95% CI
Fiber-0.17± 3.16
Placebo-9.53± 18.74

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Fiber
Serious: 0/9 (0%)
Deaths: 0/9
Placebo
Serious: 0/11 (0%)
Deaths: 0/11
Other adverse events (25 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemFiberPlacebo
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Oropharyngeal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
FeverGeneral disorders
Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations
AngioedemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sore throatGastrointestinal disorders
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
SneezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
WheezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mouth painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Car accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ear painEar and labyrinth disorders
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders
Viral conjunctivitisInfections and infestations
HeadacheNervous system disorders
Allergic reaction to foodImmune system disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05138757 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and efficacy of using a prebiotic as an adjunctive therapy to peanut oral immunotherapy. The prebiotic is not an FDA approved drug or medication rather a fiber found at local grocery stores.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023.
    Bartha I, Almulhem N, Santos AF. · · 2024 · cited 74× · PMID 38101757 · DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.11.918
  2. The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Food Allergy.
    Sindher SB, Fiocchi A, Zuberbier T, Arasi S, et al · · 2024 · cited 21× · PMID 38013157 · DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.032
  3. Commensal collaborations: Food allergy and the microbiome.
    Arditi Z, Bunyavanich S. · · 2023 · cited 10× · PMID 37558058 · DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.001
  4. Microbiome Therapeutics for Food Allergy.
    Chernikova DA, Zhao MY, Jacobs JP. · · 2022 · cited 8× · PMID 36501184 · DOI 10.3390/nu14235155
  5. The Etiology of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: Potential Therapeutics and Challenges.
    Carnazza M, Werner R, Tiwari RK, Geliebter J, et al · · 2025 · cited 3× · PMID 40004029 · DOI 10.3390/ijms26041563

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Prebiotic

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Peanut Allergy

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Chicago trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05138757.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing