Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05080660

Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3526318 in Participants With Osteoarthritis

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 17 July 2024
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing LY3526318 in Osteoarthritis in 160 participants. Completed in 6 June 2022.

Timeline
12 October 2021
Primary endpoint
6 June 2022
6 June 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorEli Lilly and Company
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment160
Start date12 October 2021
Primary completion6 June 2022
Estimated completion6 June 2022
Sites30 locations across Puerto Rico, United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company — full company profile →

Who can join

40 and older, any sex, with Osteoarthritis or Osteo Arthritis Knee. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Primary · Baseline, Week 4

The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-0.95-1.24 – -0.67
Placebo-1.18-1.58 – -0.78
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.26-1.60 – -0.93
Placebo-1.45-1.92 – -0.99
Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 4

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no pain, and 4 = extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 for the pain subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed mode

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.87-2.40 – -1.36
Placebo-2.50-3.21 – -1.79
Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no pain, and 4=extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 for the pain subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model re

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-2.51-3.15 – -1.87
Placebo-2.85-3.69 – -1.99
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 4

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no stiffness, and 4=extreme stiffness. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 for the stiffness subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interva

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.04-1.32 – -0.76
Placebo-1.11-1.48 – -0.75
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no stiffness, and 4 = extreme stiffness. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 for the stiffness subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible int

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.16-1.46 – -0.86
Placebo-1.26-1.65 – -0.87
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 4

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no difficulty, and 4=extreme difficulty. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 for the physical function subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline,

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-6.48-8.21 – -4.76
Placebo-8.46-10.86 – -6.10
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function Subscale Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no difficulty, and 4=extreme difficulty. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 for the physical function subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline,

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-8.04-10.07 – -6.01
Placebo-11.09-13.82 – -8.33
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change Secondary · Baseline, Week 4

Patients Global Impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY35263183.182.97 – 3.40
Placebo3.052.75 – 3.35
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

Patients Global Impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY35263182.962.74 – 3.18
Placebo2.972.66 – 3.28
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS Secondary · Baseline, Week 4

The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.08-1.38 – -0.79
Placebo-1.38-1.79 – -0.97
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS Secondary · Baseline, Week 8

The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

GroupValue95% CI
250 mg LY3526318-1.41-1.76 – -1.05
Placebo-1.70-2.19 – -1.21

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Baseline through Week 8. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

250 mg LY3526318 (Week 1 to 4)
Serious: 1/107 (1%)
Deaths: 0/107
250 mg LY3526318/Placebo (Week 5 to 8)
Serious: 0/99 (0%)
Deaths: 0/99
Placebo (Week 1 to 4)
Serious: 1/53 (2%)
Deaths: 0/53
Placebo (Week 5 to 8)
Serious: 0/51 (0%)
Deaths: 0/51

Serious adverse events (4 terms)

ReactionSystem250 mg LY3526318 (Week 1 t…250 mg LY3526318/Placebo (…Placebo (Week 1 to 4)Placebo (Week 5 to 8)
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
DiplopiaEye disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
DysarthriaNervous system disorders
Other adverse events (80 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystem250 mg LY3526318 (Week 1 t…250 mg LY3526318/Placebo (…Placebo (Week 1 to 4)Placebo (Week 5 to 8)
HeadacheNervous system disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Abnormal dreamsPsychiatric disorders
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Balance disorderNervous system disorders
DysarthriaNervous system disorders
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders
MigraineNervous system disorders
Persistent genital arousal disorderNervous system disorders
SedationNervous system disorders
Trigeminal neuralgiaNervous system disorders
HypoaesthesiaNervous system disorders
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders
EructationGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
TendonitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations
BronchitisInfections and infestations
COVID-19Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitisInfections and infestations
SinusitisInfections and infestations

Most-reported serious reactions: Atrial fibrillation, Diplopia, Dizziness, Dysarthria.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05080660 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of study drug LY3526318 in for the treatment of knee pain due to with osteoarthritis (OA). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Osteoarthritis Pain.
    Yu H, Huang T, Lu WW, Tong L, et al · · 2022 · cited 93× · PMID 35563035 · DOI 10.3390/ijms23094642
  2. Ion channels in osteoarthritis: emerging roles and potential targets.
    Zhou R, Fu W, Vasylyev D, Waxman SG, et al · · 2024 · cited 39× · PMID 39122910 · DOI 10.1038/s41584-024-01146-0
  3. Clinical proof-of-concept results with a novel TRPA1 antagonist (LY3526318) in 3 chronic pain states.
    Mellado Lagarde MM, Wilbraham D, Martins RF, Zhao HS, et al · · 2024 · cited 7× · PMID 39679712 · DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003487
  4. The role of TRPA1 in lung cancer.
    O'Connor D, Finn SP, Gray SG. · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 41234585 · DOI 10.21037/tlcr-2025-114
  5. Physiological functions and pharmacological targeting of transient receptor potential channels.
    Chubanov V, Grimm C, Hill K, Schaefer M, et al · · 2025 · PMID 41118703 · DOI 10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100089

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of LY3526318

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Osteoarthritis

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Eli Lilly and Company trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05080660.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing