40 and older, any sex, with Osteoarthritis or Osteo Arthritis Knee. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Primary· Baseline, Week 4
The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-0.95
-1.24 – -0.67
Placebo
-1.18
-1.58 – -0.78
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Secondary· Baseline, Week 8
The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.26
-1.60 – -0.93
Placebo
-1.45
-1.92 – -0.99
Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 4
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no pain, and 4 = extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 for the pain subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed mode
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.87
-2.40 – -1.36
Placebo
-2.50
-3.21 – -1.79
Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 8
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no pain, and 4=extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 for the pain subscale. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model re
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-2.51
-3.15 – -1.87
Placebo
-2.85
-3.69 – -1.99
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 4
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no stiffness, and 4=extreme stiffness. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 for the stiffness subscale.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interva
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.04
-1.32 – -0.76
Placebo
-1.11
-1.48 – -0.75
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 8
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no stiffness, and 4 = extreme stiffness. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 for the stiffness subscale.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible int
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.16
-1.46 – -0.86
Placebo
-1.26
-1.65 – -0.87
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 4
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no difficulty, and 4=extreme difficulty. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 for the physical function subscale.
Posterior mean change from baseline,
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-6.48
-8.21 – -4.76
Placebo
-8.46
-10.86 – -6.10
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function SubscaleSecondary· Baseline, Week 8
The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0=no difficulty, and 4=extreme difficulty. The scores for each subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the questions in each respective subscale for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 for the physical function subscale.
Posterior mean change from baseline,
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-8.04
-10.07 – -6.01
Placebo
-11.09
-13.82 – -8.33
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of ChangeSecondary· Baseline, Week 4
Patients Global Impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
3.18
2.97 – 3.40
Placebo
3.05
2.75 – 3.35
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of ChangeSecondary· Baseline, Week 8
Patients Global Impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
2.96
2.74 – 3.18
Placebo
2.97
2.66 – 3.28
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRSSecondary· Baseline, Week 4
The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.08
-1.38 – -0.79
Placebo
-1.38
-1.79 – -0.97
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRSSecondary· Baseline, Week 8
The NRS was used during the preliminary data entry period and daily throughout the study to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.
Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Group
Value
95% CI
250 mg LY3526318
-1.41
-1.76 – -1.05
Placebo
-1.70
-2.19 – -1.21
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of study drug LY3526318 in for the treatment of knee pain due to with osteoarthritis (OA). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT05580250 — A Study of LY3526318 in Healthy Male Japanese Participants
· Phase 1
· withdrawn
NCT05177094 — Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3526318 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT05086289 — Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3526318 in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT04682119 — A Safety Study of LY3526318 in Healthy Participants
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT04183283 — A Study of LY3526318 in Healthy Women
· Phase 1
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Osteoarthritis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07404891 — Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of ALT001 in Osteoarthritis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07118501 — A Prospective, Post-Market, Clinical Follow-up Study of the Incompass™ Total Ankle System
· recruiting
NCT06631638 — EMPHASYS Cup Positioning in THA With Non-Invasive Navigation (Velys Hip Navigation (VHN))
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07198750 — "Bimodal vs Unimodal High-Intensity Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis"
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07006714 — Preoperative Correction of Vitamin D Deficiency in Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA)
· Phase 4
· active not recruiting
Other Eli Lilly and Company trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07533006 — A Study of LY4005130 in Adult Participants With Severe Alopecia Areata (Hair Loss)
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07533019 — A Study of LY4005130 in Adult Participants With Non-Segmental Vitiligo
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07247357 — A Study of LY4064809 in Healthy Adult Chinese Participants
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT07124013 — A Study of Olomorasib (LY3537982) in Healthy Japanese Participants
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT07030127 — A Study of LY3985863 in Healthy Participants
· Phase 1
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Eli Lilly and Company
Last refreshed: 17 July 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05080660.