Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in AN Count at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodPrimary· Baseline, Week 16
The AN count was defined as the sum of the number of abscesses and inflammatory nodules from all locations.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
-5.9
± 6.05
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
-4.1
± 4.63
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
-5.6
± 7.40
Percent Change From Baseline in AN Count at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Baseline, Week 16
The AN count was defined as the sum of the number of abscesses and inflammatory nodules from all locations.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
-44.7
± 39.23
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
-36.7
± 36.59
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
-41.2
± 43.69
Number of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 50 (HiSCR50): Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Week 16
The number of participants with at least a 50% decrease from Baseline AN count, and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas in comparison to baseline (HiSCR50) at Week 16 was calculated for each treatment group as follows:
A responder HiSCR50 was defined as a participant with
1. at least a 50% decrease in AN count from Baseline, and
2. no increase in abscess count relative to Baseline, and
3. no increase in draining fistula count relative to Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
16
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
16
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
15
Change From Baseline in Worst HS Pain NRS Score at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Baseline, Week 16
Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing the HS worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst imaginable symptoms).
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
-0.3
± 2.89
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
-0.7
± 2.37
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
-0.4
± 3.22
Change From Baseline in Average HS Pain NRS Score at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Baseline, Week 16
Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing the average intensity over the last 7 days of their HS pain symptoms on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst imaginable symptoms).
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
-0.5
± 2.29
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
-1.0
± 2.48
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
-0.5
± 2.74
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst HS Pain NRS Score at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Baseline, Week 16
Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing the HS worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst imaginable symptoms). Only participants that had Baseline score of \>0 could be included in the analysis of Percent Change from Baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
7.6
± 81.81
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
10.2
± 146.92
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
30.3
± 136.89
Percent Change From Baseline in Average HS Pain NRS Score at Week 16: Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· Baseline, Week 16
Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing the average intensity over the last 7 days of their HS pain symptoms on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst imaginable symptoms). Only participants that had Baseline score of \>0 could be included in the analysis of Percent Change from Baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
-1.3
± 58.54
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
-18.3
± 37.76
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
4.5
± 77.25
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): Placebo-Controlled PeriodSecondary· From first dose (placebo-controlled period) up to Week 16
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if the date of onset was during or after first dose of study treatment during placebo-controlled period, or if the AE present at baseline worsened in either intensity or frequency after first dose of study treatment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
19
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
14
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
18
Number of Participants With TEAEs: Extension and Follow-up PeriodSecondary· From first dose (extension period) up to Week 40
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if the date of onset was during or after first dose of study treatment in extension period, or if the AE present at baseline worsened in either intensity or frequency after first dose of study treatment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Extension Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
15
Extension Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
18
Extension Period: Placebo to Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
9
Extension Period: Placebo to Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
10
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From first dose up to Week 40.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
Serious: 0/50 (0%)
Deaths: 0/50
Placebo-Controlled Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
Serious: 2/50 (4%)
Deaths: 0/50
Placebo-Controlled Period: Placebo
Serious: 3/49 (6%)
Deaths: 0/49
Extension Period: Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
Serious: 0/40 (0%)
Deaths: 0/40
Extension Period: Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
Serious: 1/42 (2%)
Deaths: 0/42
Extension Period: Placebo to Imsidolimab 400/200 mg
Serious: 0/19 (0%)
Deaths: 0/19
Extension Period: Placebo to Imsidolimab 200/100 mg
NCT04856917 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Acne Vulgaris
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT04697069 — A Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Acneiform Rash
· Phase 2
· terminated
NCT04697056 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Participants With Ichthyosis
· Phase 2
· terminated
NCT03633396 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Palmoplantar Pustulosis
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT03619902 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
· Phase 2
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07244263 — A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07225569 — A Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety With SAR445399 in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Sup
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07243782 — Regulatory Post-Marketing Surveillance in Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Pediatric Plaque Psoriasis and JIA Treated With Cose
· recruiting
NCT07282015 — Real-world Secukinumab Outcomes in Canadian HS Patients
· recruiting
NCT07228390 — A 16-Week Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Ritlecitinib in Adults With Long Lasting Painful Red Skin Lumps
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other Vanda Pharmaceuticals trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07446439 — A Study to Evaluate Tradipitant on Treating Nausea and Vomiting Induced by GLP-1R Agonist Use
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06804603 — A Study to Measure the Effects of Using Tradipitant on Nausea and Vomiting After GLP-1R Agonist Use
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT06701396 — Evaluating the Effects of Tasimelteon Vs. Placebo in Delayed Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder (DSWPD) and the CRY1Δ11 Variant
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06494397 — Pharmacokinetic Study of VHX-896 and Iloperidone Tablets Under Steady-State Conditions
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT05903924 — Motion Serifos: A Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Tradipitant in Participants Affected by Motion Sickness
· Phase 3
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Vanda Pharmaceuticals
Last refreshed: 22 September 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04856930.