Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04818710

Scalpel Versus Diathermy Skin Incision in Repeated CS

Completed NA Last updated 26 March 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing skin incision with a scalpel in Benifits of Using Diathermy in Skin Incision in 476 participants. Completed in 31 January 2021.

Timeline
1 May 2019
Primary endpoint
31 December 2020
31 January 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNational Research Centre, Egypt
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment476
Start date1 May 2019
Primary completion31 December 2020
Estimated completion31 January 2021
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

National Research Centre, Egypt — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 40, female only, with Benifits of Using Diathermy in Skin Incision. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study was performed to compare both methods of skin incisions to determine differences in postoperative pain, hemodynamic changes, incisional time, blood loss during incision, wound healing, and wound complication.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other National Research Centre, Egypt trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04818710.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing