Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04807504

Ropivacaine Pharmacokinetics in ESP Blocks

Completed Last updated 9 September 2025
What this trial tests

trial testing Ropivacaine in Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in 20 participants. Completed in 23 September 2021.

Timeline
26 March 2021
Primary endpoint
23 September 2021
23 September 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorThomas Jefferson University
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment20
Start date26 March 2021
Primary completion23 September 2021
Estimated completion23 September 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity or Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This is a pharmacokinetic study to determine risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity of ropivacaine when used in erector spinae plane blocks for thoracic surgery. Through serial blood sampling and the use of NONMEM population pharmacokinetic analysis this risk will be determined for the study population and other populations as well. Pain and quality of recovery will also be assessed.The erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first described in 2016 as a novel fascial plane block that provided analgesia for thoracic neuropathic pain. Since then hundreds of articles have been published that have reported use of the ESP block for indications such as rib fractures, breast surgery, abdominal surgery, and even shoulder surgery. It has also been studied in thoracic surgery and clinical experience confirms that patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracic surgery experience satisfactory analgesia with ESP blocks. Because the block location is further from the neuraxis than both epidural and paravertebral blocks, ESP blocks have been suggested as a safer alternative to these older blocks but safety data have not yet been generated. In particular, the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) has not been studied in ESP blocks. While the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine used for thoracic paravertebral blocks have been established, similar studies have yet to be performed for the newer ESP block. Of particular concern for ESP blocks are two factors not present in some other blocks with established safety: 1). significant intercostal spread has been noted in anatomical studies, which could put patients at risk for LAST and 2). some of the proposed dosing regimens involve the intermittent injection of large bolus doses of local anesthetic. While measurement of arterial plasma levels is useful and necessary to study the safety of ropivacaine given in ESP blocks, the measurements alone do not allow for prediction of plasma levels that would occur in populations as a whole. Nonmem is a population pharmacokinetic application that provides estimates of mean parameters and residual variability in pharmacokinetic values across populations and has been shown to generate better estimates than the two-stage approach. Nonmem will be used in this study to predict pharmacokinetics in populations with different characteristics than the one being studied here, which would create generalizable results.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Population pharmacokinetic and safety analysis of ropivacaine used for erector spinae plane blocks.
    Schwenk ES, Lam E, Abulfathi AA, Schmidt S, et al · · 2023 · cited 14× · PMID 37085287 · DOI 10.1136/rapm-2022-104252

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Ropivacaine

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Thomas Jefferson University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04807504.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing