18 and older, any sex, with Tobacco Smoking. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Provider (Staff) Knowledge of Smoking Cessation Treatment as Assessed by a 16-item ScalePrimary· Baseline, 12 months
Knowledge of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment: 16-item scale developed by our team. Items are true/false and score reflects number answered correctly. Average score range 0-16 with a higher score signifies an increased knowledge of smoking cessation treatment.
Self-efficacy for a four components of the smoking cessation intervention were evaluated using an instrument adapted from Compeau and Higgins' task-focused self-efficacy scale. Responses for items are on a Likert scale of 1-10. Average score range 1-10 and higher scores signify greater self-efficacy for the smoking cessation task.
Smoking Screening - Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
7.1
± 2
Prescribers
6.6
± 2.9
Smoking Screening - 12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
7.2
± 2.2
Prescribers
7.2
± 2.6
Readiness to Quit Assessment - Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
6.7
± 2.1
Prescribers
6.1
± 3.2
Readiness to Quit Assessment - 12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
7.3
± 2.1
Prescribers
6.6
± 3.2
Smoking Cessation Counseling - Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
5.5
± 2.8
Smoking Cessation Counseling - 12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Counseling Providers
7.0
± 2.1
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy - Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Prescribers
6.2
± 2.8
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy - 12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Prescribers
7.0
± 2.9
Number of Clients Recieved Smoking Status AssessmentSecondary· Baseline through 12 months
Assessment of smoking status measured by clinic documentation during client visits with the number below indicating the number of clients who had a smoking status assessment during the 12 month study period.
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
3406
Number of Clients Willing to Quit Smoking That Received a Willingness to Quit AssessmentSecondary· Baseline through 12 months
Assessment of willingness to quit measured by clinic documentation during client visits, with the number below indicating the number of clients who reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who had a willingness to quit assessment during the 12 month study period.
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
1192
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking Who Received Smoking Cessation Behavioral CounselingSecondary· Baseline through 12 months
Receipt of behavioral counseling measured by clinic documentation during client visits, with the number below indicating the number of clients interested in quitting smoking that reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who staff reported as receiving behavioral counseling during the 12 months study period.
Data is reported in two groups based upon whether the client had a recorded interest in quitting smoking or not, and only includes clients who reported smoking at some point during the study period. Clients can be reported in both groups if they responded differently to this que
Client Smokers Reported Interest in Quitting
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
529
Clients Not Reported Interest In Quitting Smoking
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
759
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking That Received Smoking Cessation PharmacotherapySecondary· Baseline through 12 months
Measured by clinic documentation during client visits with the number below indicating the number of clients interested in quitting smoking, that reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who staff reported as receiving smoking cessation pharmacotherapy during the 12 months study period.
Clients can be reported in both groups (Interested in quitting, not interested in quitting) if they responded differently to this question at two points over the course of the 12 months.
Client Smokers Reported Interest in Quitting
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
232
Client Smokers Not Reported Interest in Quitting
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
173
Acceptability of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 months
An adaptation of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater acceptability.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.1
± 0.5
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.0
± 0.7
Appropriateness of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 Months
An adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater appropriateness.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.2
± 0.5
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.1
± 0.7
Feasibility of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 Months
An adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater feasibility.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.1
± 0.5
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.0
± 0.7
Acceptability of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 Months
An adaptation of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater acceptability.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.1
± 0.6
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
3.9
± 0.7
Appropriateness of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 Months
An adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater appropriateness.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.1
± 0.6
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
3.9
± 0.7
Feasibility of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention MeasureSecondary· Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 Months
An adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater feasibility.
Post Training
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
4.0
± 0.7
12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Implementation Intervention
3.9
± 0.7
Sponsor's own description
This pilot study will examine whether an implementation intervention will improve delivery of evidence-based treatment for tobacco smoking cessation for patients in community mental health clinics.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Johns Hopkins University
Last refreshed: 3 September 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04796961.