Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04755309

Efficacy of an Early Rhythmic Intervention in Infancy

ENROLLING BY INVITATION NA Last updated 5 February 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Rhythmic intervention in Language Development in 125 participants. Enrolling by invitation.

Timeline
1 February 2021
Primary endpoint
31 December 2026
31 December 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorIRCCS Eugenio Medea
PhaseNA
StatusENROLLING BY INVITATION
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment125
Start date1 February 2021
Primary completion31 December 2026
Estimated completion31 December 2026
Sites1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

IRCCS Eugenio Medea — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 6 Months to 9 Months, any sex, with Language Development or Language Development Disorders. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The present project develops from a wide research line aiming at identifying very early electrophysiological risk markers for neurodevelopmental disorders. Long-term goals of the study include the characterization of language/learning developmental trajectories in children at high risk for language disorders and the implementation of ecological interventions based on enriched auditory experience to be employed to these children in an attempt to modify their atypical developmental trajectory before the emergence and crystallization of any behavioural symptoms and within the early period of known maximum cerebral plasticity. Specifically, the main aim of this study is the development and implementation of an innovative and ecological early intervention based on environmental auditory enrichment (labelled "rhythmic intervention"). This intervention is tested both on a sample of typically developing infants and on a sample of infants at high familial risk for language disorders during a time span between 7 and 9 months of age. The efficacy of the intervention is tested on the electrophysiological markers tested before and after the intervention activities and on the linguistic outcomes within a longitudinal approach. The efficacy of such an intervention is compared to the spontaneous development observed in comparable groups of infants with and without familial risk for language disorders. In addition, only in a group of typically developing infants, a control intervention providing passive exposure to the same auditory stimulation is tested, in order to verify the specific contribution of the active participation of the children to the intervention. The investigators hypothesize that the rhythmic intervention may modify the electrophysiological markers underlying auditory processing and the linguistic skills of all children, with a larger increase in infants at familial risk for language disorders who are specifically impaired in such skills.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Language Development

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other IRCCS Eugenio Medea trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04755309.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing