Adults 18 to 65, any sex, with Major Depressive Disorder or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Affective Updating Task (Pe et al., 2013; Pe, Raes, et al., 2013)Primary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
The Affective Updating task (Pe et al., 2013; Pe, Raes, et al., 2013) measures updating of affective information in working memory. The task requires participants to continuously monitor and modify relevant affective information in working memory. Performance is inhibited by rumination. Forty-seven positive and 49 negative words are included. Under high levels of stress, deficits in affective updating predict more depressive symptoms over one year (Pe et al., 2016) and efficiency of reappraisal (Pe et al., 2013). Affective updating in contrast, predicts subjective well-being (Pe et al., 2013).
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
0.54
± 0.23
Idiographic Behavioral Approach TaskPrimary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
The Idiographic Behavioral Approach Task (BAT; Mori \& Aermendariz, 2001; Haynes, 2001) will use in vivo confrontation with feared or avoided stimuli measuring avoidance behavior. Each BAT is unique to each participant (e.g., news/videos of similar events, pictures of loved one). A general list of idiographic stimuli will be developed with participants, who will then approach the stimuli.
The task requires participants to rate their subjective units of distress (SUDs) on a scale of 0-100 (0 = no distress, 100 = extreme distress). The primary outcome measured is mean peak SUDs. The mean peak S
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
25.65
± 22.47
Probabilistic Reward Task (Pizzagalli et al., 2005)Primary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
The Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) assesses reward responsivity (e.g., Der-Avakian et al. 2013; Pizzagalli et al., 2005, 2008, 2008). In each trial, participants choose which of 2 difficult-to-differentiate stimuli was presented. Stimuli are groups of bunnies or dogs (diameter: 25 mm; eyes: 7 mm). Unknown to them, correct identification of the "rich stimulus" is rewarded 3 times more frequently ("Correct! You won 20 cents"). Reward propensity is calculated by increase in response bias during the final block relative to the first. Degree of response bias toward the frequently reinforced altern
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
-.03
± .25
Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (Foa et al., 1999)Secondary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI; Foa et al., 1999) is a self-report that measures negative posttraumatic stressor-related thoughts that can contribute to the development and maintenance of PTSD. The measure includes 33 items grouped into three subscales. The 21-item Negative Cognitions about Self scale measures negative self-perception since the traumatic event. The 7-item Negative Cognitions about the World subscale evaluates mistrust of others and perceptions of danger. The 5-item Self Blame scale measures self-blame since the traumatic incident. All items are measured on a scal
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
102.05
± 43.14
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (Kanter et al., 2006)Secondary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (Secondary Measure; BADS; Kanter et al., 2006) is a 25- item self-report of approach and avoidance in cognitive and behavioral domains not specific to depression. Items are rated from 0 = Not at all to 6 = Completely. The measure contains four subscales which include Activation, Avoidance/Rumination, Work/School Impairment, and Social Impairment. Total scores, which range from 0-150 are calculated by summing the four subscales. A higher score indicates higher behavioral activation and lower scores indicate more depressive symptoms. The BADS has good f
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
106.5
± 24.97
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (Snaith et al., 1995)Secondary· Score at 6 weeks (immediately post treatment)
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Snaith et al., 1995). The SHAPS is a 14- item self-report measuring the capacity to experience pleasure. On a four-point scale (1 = Strongly Agree to 4 = Strongly Disagree), varying statements are rated (e.g., "I would find pleasure in small things"; "I would find pleasure in a telephone call from a friend"). The measure has good convergent and discriminant validity and reflects a unidimensional construct of anhedonia (Leventhal et al., 2006; Nakonezny et al., 2010). Total scores are measured on a scale from 14 to 56 (14 = severe anhedonia, 56 = no anhedo
Group
Value
95% CI
Receive PATH Therapy
21.79
± 2.69
Sponsor's own description
The R61 will be an open trial to determine if Positive Processes and Transition to Health (PATH) engages the proposed targets: unproductive processing, avoidance, and reward deficits in a sample of 45 adults who have experienced a destabilizing life event involving profound loss or threat, report persistent stressor-related symptoms of PTSD and/or depression, and are elevated on symptoms related to 2 of the 3 therapeutic targets. Additionally, will examine whether patients perceive PATH as helpful and complete/adhere to treatment, and therapist fidelity. Patients will receive 6 sessions of PATH (with 2 boosters, if partial responders). Primary targets will be assessed at pre-treatment, week 4, post-treatment, and at 1- and 3-month follow-up; secondary targets at pre-treatment, weekly during treatment, post-treatment, and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Other recruiting trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07219394 — Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation in a CCBHC
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06705478 — Pramipexole Versus Escitalopram to Treat Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Comorbid MDD With Mild Neurocognitive Disor
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06749392 — An Individual-specific Synchrony Signature
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07316803 — Group Intervention for Romantic Relationships in Young Adults With Severe Mental Illness
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07242105 — Optimizing Brain Excitability in Depression
· NA
· recruiting
Other Case Western Reserve University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07216950 — Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER)
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07006935 — REACH Study (Recovery Environments: Assessing Cognitive & Brain Health in Community Mental Health)
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07214233 — Youth Empowerment and Safety Intervention
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07225582 — Development of Optimal Sensory Feedback Strategies to Maximize Function After Tetraplegia
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07217249 — Effect of Donor Diabetes and Other Factors on Corneal Transplant Endothelial Cell Loss and Success at 5 Years
· NA
· enrolling by invitation
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Case Western Reserve University
Last refreshed: 30 October 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04678232.