18 and older, any sex, with Mental Illness or Shared Decision Making. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH)Primary· Baseline, 3 months
The 13-item Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH) assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-managing one's chronic health condition. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater activation.
The 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure assesses commitment, informed choice, and navigation. Scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more engagement.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
2.4
± 0.7
3 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
2.4
± 0.6
Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5)Secondary· Baseline, 3 months
The 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5) measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit; scores range from 1-10. The questionnaire is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived efficacy in the interactions.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
7.6
± 2.1
3 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
7.4
± 2.1
Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) ScaleSecondary· Baseline, 3 months
Illness self management will be assessed with the consumer-rated Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scale; items are rated on a 5-point behaviorally anchored scale and averaged. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher number reflecting greater self-management.
Recovery attitudes will be assessed using the total score of the 20-item Brief version of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Using the average score, the scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating greater self-reported recovery.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
4.0
± 0.6
3 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
3.9
± 0.5
Sponsor's own description
GET PrEPD-Psychiatry is a mixed-methods, developmental study to adapt a shared decision making (SDM) intervention to be specific for psychiatry decisions (Aim 1, previously completed), evaluate its feasibility and acceptability (Aim 2), and examine potential mechanisms of change and preliminary outcomes (Aim 3) of this innovative intervention to increase SDM and self-management for adults with serious mental illness (SMI). In line with National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) priorities, we are examining whether GET PrEPD-Psychiatry engages the target mechanisms that putatively underlie the intervention (i.e., patient activation and communication self-efficacy; Aim 3). Aim 1 used approximately 200 deidentified transcripts from our prior study of SDM in psychiatry to cull language used in decision-making. These conversations were then used to program the Virtual Provider to represent common interactions and decisions in psychiatric visits. Iterative testing of the use of the Virtual Provider has been completed and feedback was obtained from our psychiatry consultants to refine the program. For Aim 2, we will recruit up to 40 patients to participate in GET PrEPD-Psychiatry (4 weekly goal setting/coaching sessions, coupled with Virtual Provider training and practice). We will assess participant satisfaction and utility ratings, as well as track their use (frequency and time-on-task) of the Virtual Provider program. For Aim 3, we will follow enrolled patient participants, interviewing them at baseline and approximately 3 months later. We hypothesize that participants will have significantly 1) improved mechanisms of change, demonstrated by increases in self-reported activation and communication self-efficacy, 2) improved SDM, and 3) improved self-management and recovery attitudes. The Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII), completed at approximately 3 months, will be used as a qualitative interview guide to understand the acceptability and impact of the intervention.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07396623 — Validation of French PHQ-4 and PC-PTSD-5 Screening Scales
· recruiting
NCT05776316 — Harm Reduction Services
· NA
· recruiting
NCT04881084 — Exploring Empathy and Compassion Using Digital Narratives
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06290648 — Forging New Paths: Building Interventions to Treat Criminogenic Needs in Community Based Mental Health Settings
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06315114 — A Transdiagnostic Mentalization-based Intervention for Parents With Mental Disorders
· NA
· recruiting
Other Indiana University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07470086 — The Role of Environmental Temperatures in Respiratory Control
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07470099 — The Role of Breathing Perception in Respiratory Control
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07179952 — Efficacy and Safety of Slow Release Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA )
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07070804 — Maternal Biomarkers and Environmental Contributors to Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children of First-time Mothers
· not yet recruiting
NCT07499583 — Psilocybin Assisted Psychotherapy for Treatment Resistant Depression and Co-occurring Substance Use Disorder
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Indiana University
Last refreshed: 26 January 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04601194.