Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04532138

C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways

Status unknown NA Last updated 31 August 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing VS-CMAC Rigid Fiberoptic Stylet in Difficult Airway Intubation in 17 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
27 May 2020
Primary endpoint
31 December 2020
31 December 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversità Politecnica delle Marche
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment17
Start date27 May 2020
Primary completion31 December 2020
Estimated completion31 December 2020
Sites1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Università Politecnica delle Marche — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Difficult Airway Intubation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

An Anticipated difficult tracheal intubation is recommended to be managed performing the so called "Awake tracheal endoscopic intubation" (ATI) with the maintenance of patient's spontaneous breathing after an adequate sedation and topical anesthesia of upper airways, providing supplemental oxygen. Initially only flexible bronchoscope was considered the device of choice (the gold standard) for ATI but in the last decade videolaryngoscopes with hyper-angulated blade have been demonstrated to be an efficacy technique. Most recently, endoscopic rigid stylets such as Bonfils (Carl Storz™) and Sensacope (Acoutronic™) have been proposed as alternative techniques for ATI in the event of expected difficult tracheal intubation. However, to date, no comparison studies have been carried out between these two kind of devices, alternative to flexible fiberscope, for ATI. This is a clinical prospective randomized-controlled trial of non inferiority. The aim of this study is to compare the intubation success rate between two different devices (C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC fiberoptic stylet) in patients with severe predicted difficult airways scheduled for elective surgery. The primary endpoint is the comparison of success rate for the tracheal intubation, demonstrating the non inferiority of videostylet efficacy compared to the most consolidated technique based on videolaryngoscope.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Difficult Airway Intubation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Università Politecnica delle Marche trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04532138.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing