Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT04226482: REUSED
Review of Efficacy of Used ultraSonic Energy Device
NA trial testing New Device in Appendicitis Acute in 100 participants. Completed in 14 May 2020.
13 April 2020
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | University of Split, School of Medicine |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | single |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 100 |
| Start date | 27 May 2019 |
| Primary completion | 13 April 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 14 May 2020 |
| Sites | 2 locations across Croatia |
Drugs / interventions tested
- New Device
- Used Device
Conditions studied
- Appendicitis Acute — all drugs for Appendicitis Acute →
- Safety Issues — all drugs for Safety Issues →
- Complication of Surgical Procedure — all drugs for Complication of Surgical Procedure →
- Device Induced Injury — all drugs for Device Induced Injury →
Sponsor
University of Split, School of Medicine
Who can join
Adults 5 to 65, any sex, with Appendicitis Acute or Safety Issues. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Single-use medical instruments are intended by the manufacturers for single-use only or for single-patient-use only. Nevertheless, single-use instruments are being reused more than once in many countries around the world. The reasons are mainly economic in developing countries and environmental in developed countries. Concerns are being raised regarding reused instruments sterility and efficacy. Since there is paucity of evidence on safety of multiple use of single-use instruments in surgery, we decided to conduct a clinical study comparing the same surgical procedure performed with new versus reused surgical instrument. We decided to study laparoscopic appendectomy which is a simple and the most common emergency surgery. Instrument under the scrutiny is ultrasonic scalpel which uses high-frequency ultrasound vibration for coagulating and cutting tissue. In the studied period of time, all eligible patients with acute appendicitis will be randomized in two groups, first having surgery with new device and the second having surgery with reused device. Removed appendix will be analyzed for lateral thermal damage and the patients will be followed-up for one month for potential differences in clinical outcomes like pain-killers consumption, length of stay and postoperative complications.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
-
Comparison of new versus reused Harmonic scalpel performance in laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis-a randomized clinical trial.
Mihanović J, Šikić NL, Mrklić I, Katušić Z, et al · · 2021 · cited 16× · PMID 33241426 · DOI 10.1007/s00423-020-02039-y
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT04226482
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Appendicitis Acute
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07521969 — Out-patiente Management for Gangrenous Acute Appendicitis: The PENDI-CSI II Randomized Clinical Trial. · NA · recruiting
- NCT06815822 — Prevention of Postoperative Hernias in Emergency Surgery · recruiting
- NCT06948071 — Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Complicated Appendicitis · NA · recruiting
- NCT06762275 — The Impact of a Diagnostic Strategy for Acute Appendicitis in Children With Acute Abdominal Pain in Primary Care · NA · recruiting
- NCT06395636 — Early Detection of Infection Using the Fitbit in Pediatric Surgical Patients · NA · recruiting
Other University of Split, School of Medicine trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07286487 — Glycyrrhetinic Acid and Acute Irritant Dermatitis · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07314944 — Maternal Sleep and Lifestyle, Metabolic Health, and Perinatal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes · recruiting
- NCT07140107 — Effectiveness of Original vs. AI-Generated Plain Language Summaries of Systematic Reviews · NA · enrolling by invitation
- NCT07078474 — Comparison of Skin Condition After Hyaluronic Acid Application on Dry vs. Moist Skin · NA · completed
- NCT07079371 — Micellar Water and the Skin Barrier: Comparing Rinsing vs. Non-Rinsing Application · NA · active not recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04226482 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Split, School of Medicine
- Last refreshed: 18 May 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04226482.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing