Adults 50 to 75, any sex, with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Cornea SensitivityPrimary· Examination of the response to saline and Muro 128 is preformed once in each patient immediately following their consent or if they request at a later more convenient time.
Cornea sensitivity to a isotonic and hyperosmotic solution is evaluated as the amount of time the eyelid is closed over a period of 150 seconds following application of first isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by Muro 128 (5% NaCl solution) after a 5 minute recovery/washout period. The evaluation is done from analyzing the recordings of each event using a multi-camera video platform. The results are reported for response to saline (baseline) and Muro (stimulant) solutions as a ratio of the time the eyelids are closed vs. open over the 150 second period of the recording.
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
0.177
± 0.073
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
0.293
± 0.036
Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet FilamentSecondary· Done once to determine whether there is a difference between control and diabetes subjects with peripheral neuropathy
This test records the mechanical sensitivity of the cornea to a filament that is touched to the cornea. The rigidity of the filament can be adjusted and the outcome is the length of the filament (6 to 1 cm) when the subjects blinks. The data will be recorded as cm.
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
5.683
± 0.066
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
5.953
± 0.026
Michigan Neuropathy Screening InstrumentSecondary· Done once as part of the determination to the subjects peripheral neuropathy.
All subjects will answer a 15 question survey that relates to symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. The score range is 0-13 with the higher score indicating poorer outcome or increased peripheral neuropathy.
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
5.720
± 0.0505
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
0.5455
± 0.3123
Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament TestSecondary· Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
The 10 g monofilament test is a routine evaluation used to screen the diabetic foot for loss of sensory sensation and part of the standard of care for any diabetic patient. The subject will remove their footwear and lie down on a table. The filament will be applied perpendicular to the skin surface on the bottom of the feet will sufficient force to allow the filament to bend. This is repeated 5 times. Each subject will be asked to tell the examiner if they feel it. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the monofilament the value each time the score given is 0. If there is no feeling the va
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
0.5577
± 0.07507
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
0.000
± 0.000
Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great ToeSecondary· Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
Vibratory sensation is a standard of care test used with patients with diabetes to test sensory nerve sensation. A 128 Hz tuning fork is used and placed over the dorsum of the great toe on the boney prominence of the distal interphalangeal joint. The subject is asked to tell the examiner if they feel the object touching their toe. This is repeated 3 times. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the object the score given is 0. If the subject fails to feel the object all 3 times the score is 1. If they feel it once or twice during the examination the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evi
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
0.6731
± 0.0551
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
0.000
± 0.000
Presence of ReflexSecondary· Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
Reflex testing is commonly used to detect sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients. The ankle reflex is examined by aligning the subjects ankle into a neutral position and the examiner strikes the Achilles tendon with a neurological hammer. An abnormal result is recorded if the subject does not display any ankle plantarflexion. The scale is 0 to 1. If the reflex is present the score given is 0. If no reflex is present the score given is 1. If the response is reduced the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
0.8125
± 0.07855
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
0.000
± 0.000
Visual AcuitySecondary· Done once to determine the subjects visual ability
A routine visual acuity eye examination will be performed. Subjects vision will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction.
Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the ability of the eye to distinguish shapes and the details of objects at a given distance (20 feet). A person with "normal vision" scores 20/20 as did all our controls. A person with 20/40 vision sees things at 20 feet that most people who don't need vision correction can see at 40 feet. Our subjects with diabetic neuropathy mean score was 20/25. The first number i
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
25
± 0.001
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
20
± 0.000
Questionnaires for Corneal SensitivitySecondary· Done once to determine extent of common eye disease such as dry eye
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI contains 12 questions relating to eye sensitivity to light, vision acuity, dryness, sensitivity when reading, using the computer, and watching TV). The OSDI is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
11.36
± 1.96
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
1.09
± 0.78
Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction VelocitySecondary· Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
This is a non-invasive method of determining conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. the scale is meters per second or m/s. The subject will be instructed to lie down on a examination table with shoes and socks removed. Afterwards, the lower ankle will be swabbed with an alcohol patch and allowed to air dry. A device containing 2 posts (about 3 inches apart) will be placed on the lower ankle in the region of the Achilles and activated. For a period of 5-10 sec the device sends a pulse stimulating the nerve distally (post located at the lower part of the ankle) and the response recorded by the
Group
Value
95% CI
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
35.60
± 4.19
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
50.50
± 3.68
Sponsor's own description
Peripheral neuropathy affects about 50% of the diabetic population and there is no treatment other than good blood glucose control, which is ineffective in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Part of the problem for the lack of an effective treatment is the inability to detect peripheral neuropathy in its early stage. The hypotheses to be addressed in the first phase of this study is that changes in cornea sensitivity (blinking and squinting) following addition of a hyperosmotic solution will provide a novel screening tool for early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. For the second phase of the study the investigators will examine the effect of fish oil treatment of diabetic subjects with neuropathy on corneal nerve density and sensitivity. Corneal nerves are the most highly innervated part of the human body with great sensitivity. The first phase will use this property and determine whether sensitivity is lost in diabetic patients with neuropathy. Preclinical studies have supported this hypothesis and now this will be tested in human subjects. Preclinical studies have also shown that treating diabetic rodents with fish oil improves nerve regeneration and outcome measures of peripheral in diabetic rodents. In the second phase the investigators will perform preliminary studies in human subjects with diabetic neuropathy and determine whether treating them with fish oil increases corneal nerve density and sensitivity.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07380880 — Comparison of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Training and Sensory Re-education in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neurop
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06591780 — Innovative Multi-Variable Biofeedback for Improving Gait Performance in Individuals With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07036796 — Effect of Melatonin in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07085130 — The Effect of Hand and Foot Exercises Combined With Cold Application or Virtual Reality on Diabetic Neuropathy
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06483620 — Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validity of the Arabic-translated NEUROPATHY-SPECIFIC QUALITY OF LIFE Questionnaire
· recruiting
Other VA Office of Research and Development trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07456150 — Personalizing Veteran Pain Care: Adapting Coaching Interventions to Support Maintenance of Self-Care
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06746727 — The Development of a Transdiagnostic Intervention to Improve Social Functioning and Intimate Relationships Among Veteran
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07362576 — Perinatal Peer Support for Veterans With Serious Mental Illness
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06766331 — Integrated Care Versus Usual Care for Opioid Use Disorder and Infectious Diseases in Veterans
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07397195 — ACT for Veterans With IBD and Mental Health Challenges
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by VA Office of Research and Development
Last refreshed: 23 May 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04222660.