18 and older, any sex, with Opioid Use. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Average Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) Per Day of Chronic Opioid Prescriptions of ClinicsPrimary· up to 30 months
The average morphine milligram equivalent will be reported at the clinic level. Patients included in this outcome are those who are prescribed at least 3 opioid orders in the last 3 consecutive months.
For a comparison of opioids doses, a conversion factors were developed to equate the many different opioids into one standard value. This standard value is based on morphine and its potency, referred to as morphine milligram equivalents (MME) or morphine equivalent doses (MED).
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
320.69
± 11.80
Academic Detailing Only
372.33
± 20.04
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
275.55
± 16.78
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
455.62
± 19.59
Average Morphine Milligram Equivalent of Chronic Opioid Prescriptions of PrescribersPrimary· up to 30 months
The average morphine milligram equivalent will be reported at the prescriber level. Patients included in this outcome are those who are prescribed at least 3 opioid orders in the last 3 consecutive months.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
39.65
± 17.24
Academic Detailing Only
45.00
± 22.46
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
36.63
± 15.77
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
48.98
± 20.15
Number of Eligible Clinics That ParticipatedSecondary· up to 30 months
The number of eligible clinics that participated in the study.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
8
Academic Detailing Only
7
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
8
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
8
Number of Clinicians Who Participated in the StudySecondary· up to 30 months
The number of eligible clinicians who participated in the study
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
65
Academic Detailing Only
60
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
66
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
77
Number of Patients at ClinicsSecondary· up to 30 months
The total number of patients seen at clinics will be used to assess clinic size.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
2486
Academic Detailing Only
2427
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
2044
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
2021
Number of Clinicians Who Attended the Intervention MeetingsSecondary· up to 30 months
The number of clinicians who attended the meeting for practice facilitation, physician peer consulting, and follow-up meetings.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
6.118461538
± 11.36059744
Academic Detailing Only
6.741935484
± 18.26451613
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
6.228070175
± 22.34556254
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
6.15
± 28.32195122
Average Hours of Intervention Received Per ClinicSecondary· up to 30 months
The average time (in hours) of intervention that clinics received.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
12.5
± 17.5
Academic Detailing Only
4.571428571
± 1.673469388
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
14.875
± 31.609375
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
6.125
± 9.609375
Average Hours of Intervention Received Per PrescriberSecondary· up to 30 months
The average time (in hours) of intervention that prescribers received. The average time the prescriber received the intervention (in hours) is the same amount of time as the average intervention time that each clinic receives, because our intervention is at the clinic level.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
12.5
± 17.5
Academic Detailing Only
4.571428571
± 1.673469388
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
14.875
± 31.609375
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
6.125
± 9.609375
Estimated Cost of Each Study Arm in US DollarsSecondary· up to 30 months
The estimated cost of each implementation sequence and combination in US dollars. The result is derived from the number of intervention hours calculated for each arm, multiplied by the average salary of the staff who gave the intervention (e.g., the facilitators, providers, and IT coordinator), referenced from publicly reported data (Medscape Family Medicine Physician Compensation Report).
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
7933.2
Academic Detailing Only
2307.84
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
9015
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
4399.32
Total Number of Patients in a Clinic Who Have Chronic Opioid PrescriptionsSecondary· up to 30 months
The total number of patients who are prescribed at least 3 opioid orders in 3 consecutive months. The number will be reported at the clinic level.
Group
Value
95% CI
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation
985
Academic Detailing Only
1175
Academic Detailing+Practice Facilitation+Physician Peer Consul
681
Academic Detailing+Physician Peer Consulting
925
Sponsor's own description
This study aims to understand the optimal sequencing and combination of implementation strategies that specific types of clinics and prescribers need to adopt clinical guidelines for opioid prescribing. The pragmatic goal is to give health systems a tool they can use to predict which clinics and prescribers will benefit most from which sequence and combination of implementation strategies.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07342504 — Better Experiences in Substance Treatment: A Brief Alcohol-focused Intervention Tailored for Patients in Opioid Agonist
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07004686 — Effect of MGRNOX-Guided General Anesthesia on Opioid Consumption in Patients
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06981195 — Effects of Lemborexant on Insomnia and Its Relationship to Mood and Behavior on Opioid Use Disorder Subjects
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06806163 — Machine-Learning Prediction and Reducing Overdoses With EHR Nudges
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06909851 — Comparison of Pain Relief After Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: Adductor Canal Block and Genicular Nerve Block
· NA
· recruiting
Other University of Wisconsin, Madison trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07440004 — Testing a Digital Mindfulness Program to Support People Experiencing Suicidal Thoughts
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07278466 — The COMParing App Support Strategies Study
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07475104 — Redesigning Surgical Care for Patients in Wisconsin
· NA
· enrolling by invitation
NCT07470723 — The ORIGIN-FH Study
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06975657 — Well-being Skills for Reentry
· NA
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Wisconsin, Madison
Last refreshed: 17 June 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04044521.