Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04031404

Glucose and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Terminated NA Results posted Last updated 27 September 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Single-pulse TMS in Glucose Metabolism Disorders in 23 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
11 September 2019
Primary endpoint
31 August 2020
31 August 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingsingle
Primary purposebasic science
Enrollment23
Start date11 September 2019
Primary completion31 August 2020
Estimated completion31 August 2020
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Who can join

Adults 18 to 65, any sex, with Glucose Metabolism Disorders. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Primary · Measurements will be taken before the administration of the drink, as well as 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after the administration of the drink.

Change in MEP over time to indicate changes in motor cortex excitability

MEP change (0 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
MEP After Glucose Drink0.14± 0.15
MEP After Placebo Drink-0.25± 0.07
MEP change (30 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
MEP After Glucose Drink-0.02± 0.19
MEP After Placebo Drink-0.12± 0.11
MEP change (60 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
MEP After Glucose Drink-0.08± 0.14
MEP After Placebo Drink-0.33± 0.10
MEP change (120 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
MEP After Glucose Drink-0.05± 0.16
MEP After Placebo Drink-0.25± 0.09
MEP change (180 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
MEP After Glucose Drink-0.21± 0.18
MEP After Placebo Drink-0.18± 0.10
TMS Evoked Potential (TEP) Primary · Measurements will be taken before the administration of the drink, as well as 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after the administration of the drink.

The TMS Evoked Potential (TEP) is the difference in microvolts from 25 milliseconds after a TMS pulse versus pre-TMS such that greater values indicate greater motor cortex excitability. The measure of the change in TEP over time since either glucose or water was consumed approximates a z-distribution with a range of -20 to 20 with central distribution measures of zero. TEPs were source localized and reported using a pseudo-neural activity index (PNAI) expressing source activation in relation to pre-TMS pulse trial baseline. The difference in the source peaks corresponding to the early P25 comp

TEP change (P25: 0 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
Source-localized TEP After Glucose Drink-0.04± 0.08
Source-localized TEP After Placebo Drink0.28± 0.16
TEP change (P25: 30 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
Source-localized TEP After Glucose Drink-0.11± 0.11
Source-localized TEP After Placebo Drink0.024± 0.05
TEP change (P25: 60 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
Source-localized TEP After Glucose Drink-0.16± 0.11
Source-localized TEP After Placebo Drink0.30± 0.06
TEP change (P25: 120 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
Source-localized TEP After Glucose Drink-0.16± 0.12
Source-localized TEP After Placebo Drink0.24± 0.07
TEP change (P25: 180 min vs pre-drink)
GroupValue95% CI
Source-localized TEP After Glucose Drink0.08± 0.08
Source-localized TEP After Placebo Drink0.02± 0.15
EEG Measure of Alpha Asymmetry Oscillations Secondary · Measurements will be taken before the administration of the drink, as well as 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after the administration of the drink.

Electroencephalography will be used to measure the change in lateralized alpha asymmetry (10-12 Hz electrical activity) over time

Alpha Asymm. Change (0 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Alpha Asymmetry After Glucose Drink0.15± 0.15
Alpha Asymmetry After Placebo Drink0.59± 0.45
Alpha Asymm. Change (30 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Alpha Asymmetry After Glucose Drink-0.01± 0.20
Alpha Asymmetry After Placebo Drink0.42± 0.42
Alpha Asymm. Change (60 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Alpha Asymmetry After Glucose Drink0.14± 0.22
Alpha Asymmetry After Placebo Drink0.19± 0.25
Alpha Asymm. Change (120 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Alpha Asymmetry After Glucose Drink0.18± 0.22
Alpha Asymmetry After Placebo Drink0.33± 0.22
Alpha Asymm. Change (180 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Alpha Asymmetry After Glucose Drink0.18± 0.33
Alpha Asymmetry After Placebo Drink0.28± 0.33
EEG Measure of Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations Secondary · Measurements will be taken before the administration of the drink, as well as 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after the administration of the drink.

Electroencephalography will be used to measure the change in frontal midline theta power (5-8 Hz electrical activity) over time

Theta Power Change (0 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Glucose Drink0.12± 0.34
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink0.33± 0.28
Theta Power Change (30 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Glucose Drink0.56± 0.25
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink0.57± 0.27
Theta Power Change (60 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Glucose Drink0.94± 0.29
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink1.15± 0.32
Theta Power Change (120 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Glucose Drink0.36± 0.26
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink1.21± 0.45
Theta Power Change (180 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Glucose Drink1.48± 0.32
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink0.72± 0.34
Working Memory Task Accuracy Secondary · Measurements will be taken before the administration of the drink, as well as 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after the administration of the drink.

This outcome will analyze the change in accuracy in a computerized working memory task over time. During the task, subjects will be presented with an array of colored squares. Then, they will need to hold this array in mind during a delay period. Finally, participants will be tested on their memory of the array by responding whether a presented color is the same or different as the corresponding square in the first array. Participants' accuracy will be expressed as the percentage of correct responses (from 0% correct responses to 100% correct responses). An accuracy rate of 50% indicates that

WM Accuracy (0 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Working Memory Accuracy After Glucose Drink1.02± 0.03
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink0.97± 0.03
WM Accuracy (30 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Working Memory Accuracy After Glucose Drink1.02± 0.02
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink0.99± 0.03
WM Accuracy (60 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Working Memory Accuracy After Glucose Drink1.06± 0.02
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink1.01± 0.03
WM Accuracy (120 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Working Memory Accuracy After Glucose Drink1.05± 0.03
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink1.02± 0.03
WM Accuracy (180 min vs Baseline)
GroupValue95% CI
Working Memory Accuracy After Glucose Drink1.03± 0.03
Midline Frontal Theta Oscillations After Placebo Drink1.03± 0.03

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Up to 2 months per participant. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

TMS-EEG After Glucose Drink
Serious: 0/11 (0%)
Deaths: 0/11
TMS-EEG After Placebo Drink
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Other adverse events (13 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemTMS-EEG After Glucose DrinkTMS-EEG After Placebo Drink
SleepinessGeneral disorders
HeadacheGeneral disorders
ItchingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Worsening moodPsychiatric disorders
Trouble concentratingGeneral disorders
Local rednessSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DizzinessGeneral disorders
Scalp painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ringing or buzzing noiseEar and labyrinth disorders
TinglingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Flickering lightsGeneral disorders
Burning sensationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Neck painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04031404 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Purpose: In this study, the investigators will delineate how brain network dynamics are modulated by experimentally induced elevated blood glucose levels and examine how glucose levels gate neuronal excitability measured by the response to TMS. Participants: Participants must be between the ages of 18 and 65 with no known diabetes, no known adverse reaction to finger prick blood draw, and no known neurological or psychiatric illness. Participants must have a body-mass index less than 30. Procedures: Participants will consume either a drink that contains 75 g of glucose or a placebo, and their response to TMS will be measured to examine the effect of glucose on motor cortex excitability.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Causal role of frontal-midline theta in cognitive effort: a pilot study.
    McFerren A, Riddle J, Walker C, Buse JB, et al · · 2021 · cited 28× · PMID 34469696 · DOI 10.1152/jn.00068.2021

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Single-pulse TMS

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Glucose Metabolism Disorders

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04031404.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing