A Phase 3B, Open-label, Single-arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast, in Subjects With Plaque Psoriasis That is Not Adequately Controlled by Topical Therapy
CompletedPhase 3Results postedLast updated 20 January 2022
What this trial tests
Phase 3 trial testing Apremilast in Plaque Psoriasis in 152 participants. Completed in 25 September 2020.
20 and older, any sex, with Plaque Psoriasis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 16Primary· Week 16
The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
The National Psoriasis Foundation Psoriasis Score version of a static PGA is calculated by averaging the total body erythema, induration, and desquamation scores. The overall scores are as follows:
0 = Clear;
1. = Almost Clear;
2. = Mild;
3. = Moderate;
4. = Severe.
The percentage of participants with a sPGA response was estimated using a multiple imputation method fro
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
43.7
35.72 – 51.66
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 32Secondary· Week 32
The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
The National Psoriasis Foundation Psoriasis Score version of a static PGA is calculated by averaging the total body erythema, induration, and desquamation scores. The overall scores are as follows:
0 = Clear;
1. = Almost Clear;
2. = Mild;
3. = Moderate;
4. = Severe.
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
40.8
32.98 – 48.60
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Physicians Global Assessment (ScPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Weeks 16 and 32Secondary· Weeks 16 and 32
The ScPGA assesses scalp involvement of psoriasis based on scalp plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema. The 5-point ScPGA scale ranges from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe).
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
52.3
43.69 – 61.00
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
50.8
42.12 – 59.44
Change From Baseline in Percentage of BSA Affected by Psoriasis at Weeks 16 and 32Secondary· Baseline and weeks 16 and 32
The overall body surface area affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand, which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA affected by psoriasis is expressed as a percentage of total body surface area.
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-7.86
± 8.755
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-8.32
± 9.478
Percent Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 16, and 32Secondary· Baseline and weeks 2, 16, and 32
Participants were asked to indicate how much itch they have had due to psoriasis in the past week by placing a vertical stroke on a 100 mm line on which the left-hand boundary (0 mm) represented no itch, and the right-hand boundary (100 mm) represented worst itch imaginable. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-36.96
± 46.474
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-28.05
± 118.300
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-25.29
± 122.113
Mean Change From Baseline in Shiratori's Pruritus Severity Score at Weeks 2, 16, and 32Secondary· Baseline and weeks 2, 16, and 32
Shiratori's Pruritus Severity Score is a pruritus (itchiness) severity assessment tool used in Japan. Daytime and nighttime pruritus were evaluated and scored separately. Daytime pruritus was rated on a five-grade scale: 0 (absent), 1 (endurable without scratching; minimal), 2 (subsides with slight scratching; mild), 3 (subsides with considerable scratching; moderate), or 4 (not subsiding with scratching, which prompts repeated scratching; severe).
Nighttime pruritus was rated on a five-grade scale: 0 (absent), 1 (slight itching at bedtime but not causing intentional scratching; no difficulty
Daytime: Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.5
± 0.77
Daytime: Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.7
± 0.95
Daytime: Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.7
± 0.95
Nighttime: Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.4
± 0.85
Nighttime: Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.7
± 0.86
Nighttime: Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-0.7
± 0.91
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in NAPSI Score (NAPSI-50) at Weeks 16 and 32 Among Participants With NAPSI ≥ 1 at BaselineSecondary· Weeks 16 and 32
One target thumb nail or fingernail representing the worst nail psoriasis involvement was selected for assessment at Baseline.
The nail matrix was assessed for presence of any of the nail matrix features (pitting, leukonychia red spots in the lunula, crumbling) graded on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (present in all 4 quadrants).
The nail bed was assessed for the presence of any nail bed features (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, "oil drop" (salmon patch dyschroma) on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (present in all quadrants).
The sum of the nail matrix and nail bed scores
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
44.7
33.56 – 55.92
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
57.9
46.79 – 68.99
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Weeks 16 and 32Secondary· Baseline and weeks 16 and 32
The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answer 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much), except for Question 7, which first asks whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes (score = 3) or No (score = 0), then If "No", the participant is asked how much their ski
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-2.2
± 2.96
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-2.3
± 2.97
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Weeks 16 and 32Secondary· Baseline and weeks 16 and 32
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. The PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-69.61
± 22.896
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
-69.48
± 25.421
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-75)Secondary· Weeks 16 and 32
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. The PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity.
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
43.4
35.54 – 51.30
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
46.7
38.78 – 54.64
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-50)Secondary· Weeks 16 and 32
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. The PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity.
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
79.6
73.20 – 86.01
Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
75.0
68.12 – 81.88
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Sub-domain ScoresSecondary· Baseline and weeks 16 and 32
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version II is a self-administered instrument to understand a participant's satisfaction on current therapy. The TSQM comprises 11 items across 4 domains focusing on effectiveness (Item 1 and 2), side effects (Item 4 to 6), convenience (Item 7 to 9), and global satisfaction (Item 10 and 11). With the exception of Item 3 (experience any side effects; yes or no), all items have five or seven responses. Item scores are summed to give four domain scores, which are in turn transformed to a scale from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 100 (ex
Effectiveness: Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
52.25
± 17.553
Effectiveness: Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
67.41
± 21.176
Effectiveness: Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
68.93
± 19.067
Side Effects: Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
97.37
± 10.078
Side Effects: Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
90.40
± 17.714
Side Effects: Week 32
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
93.21
± 14.947
Convenience: Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
56.43
± 16.735
Convenience: Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Apremilast
70.34
± 17.201
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until at least 28 days after last dose; up to 36 weeks..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of apremilast plus topical therapies for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis who have not achieved an adequate response with topicals alone.
Publications & conference data
4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07398651 — Apremilast and Adalimumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07325266 — Human Laboratory Study of Apremilast for Alcohol Use Disorder
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07432386 — Methotrexate Versus Apremilast for Pruritus in Psoriasis
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07352566 — Utilization of a Microdevice for Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07337434 — To Check Comparison of Apremilast and Methotrexate Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Present
· EARLY_PHASE1
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Plaque Psoriasis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07357831 — A Phase III Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of MC2-01 Cream Compared To CAL/BDP Gel and Vehicle In Plaque Psor
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07250802 — A Long-Term Study of Zasocitinib in Children and Teenagers With Plaque Psoriasis
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06979453 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Drug Levels of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) in Adolescent Participants Wit
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07234591 — A Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of a TYK2 Inhibitor in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07116967 — Long-Term Safety Study of Deucravacitinib Versus Ustekinumab in Participants With Psoriasis (PRAGMATYK)
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Other Amgen trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07223190 — A Study Evaluating Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Blinatumomab in Newly Diagnosed Adults With B-cell Precursor Acute Ly
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07493512 — Trial of Xaluritamig in Adults With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07531095 — Study of Tarlatamab + ZL-1310 +/- Anti-programmed Death Ligand 1 (Anti-PD-L1) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06987539 — A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Inebilizumab in Children With Gen
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05909761 — Observational Safety Study in Women With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Exposed to UPLIZNA® During Pregn
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Amgen
Last refreshed: 20 January 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03930186.