Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03774888

To Compare Different Soft Tissue Grafts at the Time of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Procedure.

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 9 May 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Connective tissue graft at time of bone graft in Bone Graft; Complications, Infection or Inflammation in 24 participants. Completed in 5 July 2023.

Timeline
3 October 2019
Primary endpoint
10 May 2021
5 July 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date3 October 2019
Primary completion10 May 2021
Estimated completion5 July 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Who can join

Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Bone Graft; Complications, Infection or Inflammation or Ridge Deficency. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Measure Changes Clinically in Crestal Soft Tissue Thickness (in mm) Primary · From baseline to 6 months

The changes in clinical vertical crestal soft tissue thickness by using an endodontic file and periodontal probe.

GroupValue95% CI
Connective Tissue Graft1.96± 1.05
Acellular Dermal Matrix1.59± 1.06
No Soft Tissue Graft (Control)0.33± 1
Measure Changes Digitally in Crestal Soft Tissue Thickness (in mm) Primary · From baseline to 6 months

The changes in soft tissue thickness digitally with superimposition of the intraoral scan and cone-bone computed tomography scan.

GroupValue95% CI
Connective Tissue Graft1.65± 0.95
Acellular Dermal Matrix0.74± 0.93
No Soft Tissue Graft (Control)-0.09± 0.61
Measure Changes Clinically in Soft Tissue Thickness at 4mm Apical From Gingival Margin Primary · From baseline to 6 months

The changes in clinical soft tissue thickness at 4mm apical form the gingival margin by using an endodontic file and periodontal probe.

GroupValue95% CI
Connective Tissue Graft2.38± 1.32
Acellular Dermal Matrix1.37± 1.2
No Soft Tissue Graft (Control)0.15± 1.65
Measure Changes Digitally in Soft Tissue Thickness at 4mm Apical Form Gingival Margin Primary · From baseline to 6 months

The changes in soft tissue thickness digitally with superimposition of the intraoral scan and cone-bone computed tomography scan.

GroupValue95% CI
Connective Tissue Graft1.75± 0.87
Acellular Dermal Matrix1.23± 0.7
No Soft Tissue Graft (Control)0.71± 0.57

Sponsor's own description

This study will compare two commonly used soft tissue grafting techniques (connective tissue graft, CTG vs Acellular Dermal Matrix, ADM) to augment the soft tissue at the time of lateral ridge augmentation procedure. Following ridge augmentation procedure, most of the times there is a need for soft tissue augmentation to change the quality of the tissue around future implant's site. To our knowledge, the influence of soft tissue augmentation at the time of ridge augmentation procedure has not been tested defects.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Alabama at Birmingham trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03774888.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing