Adults 18 to 90, any sex, with Sudden Cardiac Arrest or Acute Myocardial Infarction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Post-Acute MI Patients Who Are Referred for Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification > Risk (SCD) Stratification and ManagementPrimary· 3-months post-MI to 12-months post-MI
The numerator for this endpoint will be defined as the number of patients who met the clinician's determination to refer the subject for SCD risk stratification and management at any of the three follow-up visits. The denominator for this endpoint is the number of patients who completed a 3-month follow-up visit. While the participant study flow is composed of "referred" and "not referred" groups, these groups are simply the results of the referral process in the single arm of enrolled patients. Thus the analysis of the endpoints is conducted within this one arm.
No hypotheses were tested for
Group
Value
95% CI
Referred Subjects
236
Not Referred Subjects
934
Percentage of Post-Acute MI Patients Who Are Known to be Indicated for an ICD/CRT-D Within 12 Months Post-MISecondary· 3-months post-MI to 12-months post-MI
The numerator for this endpoint will be the number of subjects who were indicated for an ICD/CRT-D device during any of the three follow-up visits. The denominator will be the number of subjects who completed a 3-month follow-up visit.
While the participant study flow is composed of "referred" and "not referred" groups, these groups are simply the results of the referral process in the single arm of enrolled patients. Thus the analysis of the endpoints is conducted within this single arm. The analysis cannot be performed within the "referred" and "not referred" groups as patients not referred
Group
Value
95% CI
Post-acute MI Subjects
127
Percentage of Post-Acute MI Patients Who Receive an ICD/CRT-D Within 12 Months Post-MI.Secondary· 3-months post-MI to 12-months post-MI
The numerator for this endpoint will be the number of subjects who received an ICD/CRT-D device during any of the three follow-up visits. The denominator for this endpoint will be the number of patients who completed a 3-month follow-up visit.
While the participant study flow is composed of "referred" and "not referred" groups, these groups are simply the results of the referral process in the single arm of enrolled patients. Thus the analysis of the endpoints is conducted within this single arm. The analysis cannot be performed within the "referred" and "not referred" groups as patients not
Group
Value
95% CI
Post-acute MI Subjects
18
Percentage of ICD Indicated Patients Who Were Not Referred, Refused Referral or Refused Implant of an ICDSecondary· 3-months post-MI to 12-months post-MI
The outcome measure will be the percentage of patients with ICD indication, who were not referred, refused referral or refused implant. The denominator will count all patients with at least one of the below:
1. a reduced ejection fraction, as measured by the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) being lower or equal than 40%.
\>
2. ventricular arrhythmia, AV block, new onset bundle branch block, or conduction abnormalities as measured by ECGs.
\>
3. unexplained syncope, clinically significant palpitations or symptomatic bradycardia as assessed by the physician.
\> The numerato
Number of patients who who were not referred, refused referral or refused implant of an ICD/CRT-D
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
162
Number of patients not referred due to "the patient deemed referral not necessary".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
21
Number of patients not referred due to "the patient was asymptomatic".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
42
Number of patients not referred due to "the physician preferred continuing with medication".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
75
Number of patients who refused implant due to "patient does not want risk associated with implant".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
40
Number of patients who refused implant due to "patient does not believe in benefit of ICD/CRT-D".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
36
Number of patients who refused implant due to "patient unable to pay for device".
Group
Value
95% CI
Subjects Who Met Referral Criteria
62
Percentage of Post-Acute MI Patients Who Experience Cardiovascular MortalitySecondary· Enrollment to 12-months post-MI
The numerator for this endpoint will be the number of patients who experience cardiovascular mortality. The denominator will be the number of patients enrolled in the study.
No hypotheses were tested for this endpoint.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enrolled Subjects
29
Evolution of the Ejection Fraction Over the Immediate Period of Post MISecondary· Enrollment to 3-months post-MI
The Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) will be measured acutely post MI (≤14 days after MI onset) and chronically (40-90 days). The acute measurement will occur over all 1491 subjects assessed at baseline, while the chronic assessment will be measured over the 1046 subjects with a 3-month LVEF assessment. This outcome will compare the average LVEF, by percent, between these two phases.
No hypotheses were tested for this endpoint.
Acute
Group
Value
95% CI
Enrolled Subjects
39.8
± 6.8
Chronic
Group
Value
95% CI
Enrolled Subjects
46.3
± 10.3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse event data was collected starting at baseline through 12-month follow up..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of the Improve SCA Bridge study is to characterize the care pathway flow of post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients as a result of standard assessments of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the acute phase (≤14 days post- acute MI) and chronic phase (≥40-90 days post-acute MI).
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06804499 — Tampere Coronary Artery Disease and Sudden Cardiac Arrest Study
· recruiting
NCT07444931 — Validation of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Risk Factors in Patients With CAD
· recruiting
NCT06642168 — Sudden Cardiac Arrest Related to Sport in Young and Value of the Genetic Assessment: a French Prospective Register
· recruiting
NCT05135403 — ASSURE WCD Clinical Evaluation - Post Approval Study (ACE-PAS)
· recruiting
NCT03493516 — Prediction of ARrhythmic Events With Positron Emission Tomography II
· active not recruiting
Other Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06910059 — The CT-verified Data Collection Study to Investigate the Correlation Between the Leadless Pacemaker Tip Location and Ech
· active not recruiting
NCT06745778 — Evolution of Intracardiac Electrograms Recorded by Left Bundle Branch Pacing Lead in Patients With ICD or CRT-D
· recruiting
NCT06540521 — Bolt CSP-M Holter Study
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Last refreshed: 16 January 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03715790.