18 and older, any sex, with Stroke. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change in Step-length Symmetry Using Symmetry IndexPrimary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed. The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long. The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality. The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-\|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)\|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values. Higher
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
72.2
± 23.0
Conventional Gait Training
75.8
± 16.1
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
92.2
± 5.4
Conventional Gait Training
76.0
± 7.0
Change in Swing-time SymmetryPrimary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed. The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long. The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality. The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-\|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)\|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values. Higher
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
57.9
± 5.6
Conventional Gait Training
57.8
± 8.4
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
67.8
± 9.1
Conventional Gait Training
57.7
± 9.2
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Self-selected VelocitySecondary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
This test will examine the patient's gait speed. Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed. Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter. The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration. Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
0.65
± 0.19
Conventional Gait Training
0.68
± 0.21
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
0.82
± 0.24
Conventional Gait Training
0.76
± 0.25
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Fast VelocitySecondary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
This test will examine the patient's gait speed. Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed. Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter. The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration. Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
0.81
± 0.30
Conventional Gait Training
0.91
± 0.47
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
1.14
± 0.36
Conventional Gait Training
0.96
± 0.49
Change in 6 Minute Walk TestSecondary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures the distance a subject can walk indoors on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test is a reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. The test will be used to determine participant's gait efficiency at baseline and at study completion. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patien
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
205.1
± 76.3
Conventional Gait Training
246.2
± 148.4
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
266.6
± 57.4
Conventional Gait Training
272.0
± 143.7
Change in PCI During 6 Minute Walk TestSecondary· Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
Participants completed the 6MWT as heart rate was recorded throughout the testing using a Polar H7 chest belt monitor. Prior to beginning the 6MWT, average resting heart rate was recorded for two minutes while the subject was seated and quiet. Cardiac efficiency during 6MWT was measured by physiological cost index (PCI), which reflects heart rate per meter walked. Reduced PCI indicates improved cardiac efficiency.
Pre intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
1.13
± 0.37
Conventional Gait Training
1.22
± 0.50
Post intervention
Group
Value
95% CI
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation With Gait Training
0.91
± 0.39
Conventional Gait Training
0.99
± 0.37
Sponsor's own description
This is a randomized control trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous (non-invasive) spinal cord stimulation on gait and balance function for individuals with hemiplegia due to stroke.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other trials of Noninvasive spinal stimulation with gait training
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT05167786 — Locomotor Function Following Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in Individuals With Hemiplegic Stroke
· NA
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Stroke
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06615973 — Screening for Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) and Cognitive Function in Individuals With History of Stroke
· recruiting
NCT07494890 — Measurement Properties of Mechanical Cost of Walking for Individuals With Walking Impairment
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07356011 — Exoskeleton for Balance
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07523503 — Unilateral Versus Bilateral Task-specific Training on Motor Impairment, Upper Extremity Function, and Hand Dexterity in
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06704074 — Virtual Reality Task Oriented Training on Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients
· NA
· recruiting
Other Shirley Ryan AbilityLab trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07434492 — Smart AFO and 5-Azacitidine to Enhance Mobility in Children With Cerebral Palsy
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07433023 — tSCS and 5-Azacitidine for Enhanced Motor Outcomes in Cerebral Palsy
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06999213 — Lower Limb ExoNET: Development and Evaluation for Gait Assistance With Stroke Survivors
· EARLY_PHASE1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07032753 — Neuromusculoskeletal Interface for Bionic Arms
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07223710 — Improving Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Last refreshed: 17 March 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03714282.