Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03711916

Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery

Completed NA Last updated 18 June 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing PlasmaBlade 3.0S in Breast Cancer in 20 participants. Completed in 3 December 2018.

Timeline
17 March 2017
Primary endpoint
24 October 2018
3 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designsingle group
Maskingsingle
Primary purposedevice feasibility
Enrollment20
Start date17 March 2017
Primary completion24 October 2018
Estimated completion3 December 2018
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, female only, with Breast Cancer or Mastectomy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Comparison of mastectomy and breast reconstruction outcomes using low thermal dissection versus traditional electrocautery: a blinded randomized trial.
    Habibi M, Prasath V, Dembinski R, Sacks JM, et al · · 2021 · cited 4× · PMID 33742323 · DOI 10.1007/s10549-021-06177-9

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Breast Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03711916.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing