Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03708562

everlinQ Endovascular Access Systems Enhancements (EASE-2) Study

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 11 December 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing everlinQ endoAVF System in Chronic Kidney Diseases in 24 participants. Completed in 12 December 2018.

Timeline
16 October 2017
Primary endpoint
12 December 2018
12 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorC. R. Bard
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date16 October 2017
Primary completion12 December 2018
Estimated completion12 December 2018
Sites1 location across Paraguay

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

C. R. Bard — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Chronic Kidney Diseases. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With Procedural Success Primary · At time of procedure

Procedure Success was defined as successful endoAVF creation confirmed via intraprocedural angiography/fistulogram or duplex ultrasound verification performed post procedure.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF19
Adverse Event Rate Primary · 3 months following endoAVF creation

Percentage of patients who experience one or more adverse events during the first 3 months following successful endoAVF creation. Adverse events were site-reported and reviewed by an independent Medical Monitor and the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF4
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 Months Post Index Procedure Secondary · 6 months post index procedure

Primary Patency was defined as the time interval between the endoAVF index procedure and the earlier of a) any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patency, b) access thrombosis, or c) access abandonment. Kaplan-Meier (KM) was used to analyze the data.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF70.8
Number of Participants With EndoAVF Maturation at 1, 3, and 6 Months Post Index Procedure Secondary · 1, 3, and 6 months post index procedure

Maturity of the endoAVF was defined by duplex ultrasound criteria, as described in the literature as a useful surrogate of suitability for dialysis. Maturation was defined as duplex ultrasound flow in the brachial artery of at least 500 ml/min and a vein diameter ≥ 4mm, without significant stenosis or thrombosis. If a subject was on hemodialysis, maturity was defined by successful dialysis with 2-needles at least once.

1 month post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF19
3 months post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF20
6 months post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF20
Time to Cannulation (Months) Secondary · Months from index procedure to cannulation

The interval of time from the index procedure to successful 2-needle cannulation of the endoAVF.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF1.2± 0.3
Number of Participants With Cannulation Success at Defined Follow-up Intervals Secondary · 0-10 days, 11-45 days, 46-135 days, 136-210 days post index procedure

A subject was referred to as a 'cannulation success' with the first successful 2-needle cannulation of the endoAVF access circuit. "Cannulation Success" was defined by at least one successful hemodialysis session through a 2-needle cannulation of the endoAVF access circuit. "Cumulative Cannulation Success" = (Successes Through End Current Interval) / (Subjects on Dialysis at Start Current Interval + Censored Dialysis Subjects through End of Last Interval).

0 to 10 days post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF0
11 to 45 days post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF11
46-135 days post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF13
136-210 days post index procedure
GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF13
Percentage of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months Secondary · 6 months post index procedure

Defined as the interval from access placement to thrombosis or abandonment; not triggered by access circuit interventions performed in the absence of occlusion.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF70.8
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months Post Index Procedure Secondary · 6 months post index procedure

Secondary Patency was defined as the time interval between the endoAVF index procedure and a) access abandonment, or b) loss to thrombosis, irrespective of intervening surgical or endovascular interventions designed to re-establish functionality in a stenosed or thrombosed access circuit.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF70.8
Percentage of Participants With Functional Patency of the endoAVF at 6 Months Post Index Procedure Secondary · 6 months post index procedure

The interval of time from the first 2-needle dialysis utilizing the access until access abandonment (SVS Reporting Standards definition). Functional Patency was the interval of time from the first 2-needle dialysis of the endoAVF access circuit until access abandonment.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF90.950.8 – 98.7
Number of Participants With EndoAVF Related Reintervention Secondary · At 6 months follow-up

The re-intervention rate for endoAVF (defined as any intervention required to maintain or re-establish patency) was calculated at each available follow-up visit post index procedure.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF3
Percentage of Participants With Modified Primary Patency at 6 Months Post Index Procedure Secondary · 6 months post index procedure

Modified Primary Patency was defined as a measure of patency that, in addition to occlusion or reinterventions within the access circuit, also included coil embolization or open surgical ligation of outflow venous branches as failures of patency when they occur after the index procedure.

GroupValue95% CI
endoAVF70.8

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were collected through 6-months post-index procedure.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

endoAVF
Serious: 4/24 (17%)
Deaths: 2/24

Serious adverse events (3 terms)

ReactionSystemendoAVF
ThrombosisVascular disorders
PseudoanurysmVascular disorders
InfectionInfections and infestations
Other adverse events (4 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemendoAVF
Pseudo-aneurysmVascular disorders
ThrombosisVascular disorders
OcclusionVascular disorders
SwellingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Thrombosis, Pseudoanurysm, Infection.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03708562 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Prospective, single-center study to evaluate the everlinQ endoAVF System when used to create an endoAVF in hemodialysis patients. This study aims to investigate expansion of the percutaneous venous access location to the superficial system which may provide additional procedural benefit.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of everlinQ endoAVF System

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Chronic Kidney Diseases

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other C. R. Bard trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03708562.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing