18 and older, any sex, with Contact Lens Discomfort or Dry Eye. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Contact Lens SymptomsPrimary· Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in contact lens symptoms as measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and CLDEQ-4 at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The CLDEQ-8 score range is 0 to 37 with 0 being the best score. Subjects were required to have a CLDEQ-8 of at least 12 in order to participate. The CLDEQ-4 is a subset of the CLDEQ-8, and it was also reported because it is a unidimensional measure of ocular discomfort in contact lens wearers. The CLDEQ-4 has a score range of 0 to 18 with 0 being the best score.
Baseline cldeq-8 (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
20.41
± 5.40
No Treatment
18.92
± 4.92
2 week cldeq-8 (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
12.86
± 6.40
No Treatment
17.92
± 5.30
Baseline cldeq-4 (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
10.91
± 3.28
No Treatment
10.38
± 2.41
2 week cldeq-4 (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
7.14
± 3.50
No Treatment
10.13
± 2.83
End of Day Eye ComfortSecondary· Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in eye symptoms as measured with the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The scale range is 0 to 28 with 0 being the best score.
Speed Score Baseline (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
10.27
± 3.60
No Treatment
9.67
± 3.93
Speed Score 2 weeks (worse eye)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
7.55
± 4.31
No Treatment
9.29
± 4.14
Corneal StainingSecondary· Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in conjuctivial staining at two weeks compared to baseline using the Brien Holden Vision Institute (BHVI) scale, which measures five regions of the eye on a (0-4) scale (max of 20 per metric). A score 0 is the best possible score.
Corneal Staining Extent (baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
1.73
± 2.45
No Treatment
1.63
± 2.50
Corneal Staining Depth (baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
1.22
± 1.54
No Treatment
0.92
± 1.32
Corneal Staining Type (baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
1.18
± 1.56
No Treatment
0.92
± 1.32
Corneal Staining Extent (2 weeks)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
1.41
± 2.42
No Treatment
1.75
± 1.98
Corneal Staining Depth (2 weeks)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
0.91
± 1.38
No Treatment
1.04
± 1.30
Corneal Staining Type (2 weeks)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
0.86
± 1.36
No Treatment
0.92
± 1.06
Schirmer's I Test Without AnestheticSecondary· Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in tear volume as measured in mm of wetting with a Schirmer's strip at 5 mins at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The score ranges is 0 mm to 35 mm with 35 mm being the best score.
Schirmers Strip Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
15.68
± 9.70
No Treatment
20.88
± 10.65
Schirmers Strip (2 weeks)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
15.41
± 9.29
No Treatment
18.30
± 10.69
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Secondary· Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in tear break up time as measured with a slit-lamp biomicroscope and sodium fluorescein in seconds at 2 weeks compared to baseline. Scores range for 0 to 60 seconds with 60 seconds being the best score.
Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
7.70
± 5.20
No Treatment
8.50
± 5.10
Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (2 weeks)
Group
Value
95% CI
Systane Complete
8.57
± 4.73
No Treatment
8.80
± 5.08
Sponsor's own description
Clinicians commonly use artificial tears off label for treating contact lens (CL) discomfort and the dry eye associated with CLs because new artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform the available CL rewetting drops. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CL discomfort. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of patients who have CL discomfort.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06886373 — Optimizing the Ocular Surface With Systane COMPLETE Pre- and Post-operatively in Patients With Dry Eye Planning for Cata
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT05056155 — Systane Complete Multi-symptom Relief
· NA
· completed
NCT04091581 — Comparison of Tear Evaporation Rate With Systane Complete in Dry Eye and Non-Dry Eye
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT03848221 — Direct Application of Systane Complete to Contact Lenses
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT03706443 — Tear Lipid Layer Thickness Changes With Use of Emollient and Non-Emollient Eye Drops
· NA
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Contact Lens Discomfort
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT03652337 — Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Management
· NA
· active not recruiting
Other University of Alabama at Birmingham trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04922229 — Comparative Effectiveness in the Management of Irreversible Pulpitis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT05060380 — Feasibility of a Novel Resistance Exercise in Individuals With Osteoporosis
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT04768777 — Behavioral Intervention for Physical Activity and Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06320951 — VITAL-IMPACT: Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Black Individuals Through Therapeutic Augmentation of Cyclic Guanosine
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07564934 — Leveraging Extended Reality Exergaming and Telehealth to Improve Physical Activity and Health in Children With Disabilit
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Alabama at Birmingham
Last refreshed: 6 April 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03682809.