Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Dry Eye Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline OSDIPrimary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions subdivided into 3 subscales for measuring the frequency of dry eye symptoms, vision-related quality of life and environmental triggers during the previous week. Answers to each question are on a scale of 0 (None of the time) to 4 (All of the time). Both total OSDI and its subscale scores are on a scale of 0 to 100, calculated as follows: score = (sum of scores for questions answered/number of questions answered) x 25. Higher scores represent greater disability.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-24.64
± 16.186
Control Eye Drops
-26.53
± 14.620
Change From Baseline Tear OsmolarityPrimary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Instrumental assay of tear fluid osmolarity (mOsm/L)
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-4.75
± 16.224
Control Eye Drops
-1.77
± 21.531
Change From Baseline TBUTPrimary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Tear film break-up time (TBUT) (s)
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
1.71
± 3.424
Control Eye Drops
0.87
± 1.809
Change From Baseline Blink RateSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Measurement of spontaneous eyelid blinks per minute
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
0.02
± 8.721
Control Eye Drops
-2.15
± 10.161
Change From Baseline Ocular Protection Index (OPI)Secondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
OPI is the ratio of TBUT/IBI (IBI, interblink interval calculated from blink rate). An OPI value \>1 indicates that TBUT (s) exceeds IBI (s) and that the ocular surface is mostly tear-film protected, because tear film break-ups do not take place within spontaneous blink cycles.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
0.56
± 1.078
Control Eye Drops
0.05
± 0.680
Change From Baseline Corneal StainingSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Corneal staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.38
± 0.695
Control Eye Drops
-0.22
± 0.522
Change From Baseline Conjunctival (Temporal) StainingSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Conjunctival staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.19
± 0.507
Control Eye Drops
-0.02
± 0.810
Change From Baseline Conjunctival (Nasal) StainingSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Conjunctival staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.27
± 0.608
Control Eye Drops
-0.12
± 0.666
Change From Baseline Visual AcuitySecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Conjunctival RednessSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Conjunctival redness score is assessed on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4 (IER grading scale):
0 = not existing, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. Higher score represents more intense redness.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.46
± 0.647
Control Eye Drops
-0.27
± 0.652
Change From Baseline Lid RednessSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Eyelid redness score is assessed on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4 (IER grading scale):
0 = not existing, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. Higher score represents more intense redness.
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.37
± 0.672
Control Eye Drops
-0.19
± 0.549
Change From Baseline Intraocular PressureSecondary· From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Intraocular pressure measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg)
Group
Value
95% CI
Emulsion Eye Drops
-0.12
± 1.705
Control Eye Drops
-0.42
± 1.653
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Part 1: 1 day; Part 2: 10 days; Part 3: 30 days.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The study evaluates the safety, ocular tolerability and efficacy of emulsion eye drops with sacha inchi seed oil, trehalose and hyaluronic acid in the treatment of moderate or severe dry eye in adult patients. The investigative device is studied in comparison with control eye drops containing hyaluronic acid for up to 30 days.
Publications & conference data
4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07295691 — Autologous Serum Eye Drops in Dry Eye Syndrome
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06914232 — Efficacy of Warm Compress Therapy in Enhancing Tear Film Quality and Reducing Postoperative DES
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06913556 — Comparing Effect of Hylorunic Acid and Lipid-coated Carbomer Gel on Dry Eyes After Phacoemulsification in DP
· NA
· active not recruiting
Other Kuopio University Hospital trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06725433 — Nissen Versus Dor Hiatal Hernia Repair
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06495268 — Healthy heaAring for Healthy Ageing: Data-driven Hearing Rehabilitation Intervention to Promote Healthy Hearing
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06740097 — Feasibility of Aspirate Tissue Monitoring in Neuro-oncological Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06460363 — Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Patients with Delirium and Critical Illness (DeliTACS)
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05863624 — Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Kuopio University Hospital
Last refreshed: 13 December 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03569202.