Question: In the past 30 days, how many times have you...drunk more than a sip of beer, wine or liquor? Scale: 0 = 0; 1 = 1-2 times; 2 = 3-5 times; 3 = 6-9 times; 4 = 10-19 times; 5 = 20-39 times; 6 = 40 or more times
Question: How many drinks of alcohol (more than a sip of beer, wine, or liquor) have you had in the past 30 days? Scale: 0 = None; 1 = One drink; 2 = 2-3 drinks; 3 = 4-7 drinks; 4=8-15 drinks; 5=16-30 drinks; 6= More than 30 drinks
Survey questions: Change in youths' responses to substance use offers in the past 30 days. Scale ranges from 0 (never responded in this way) to 5 (responded this way more than 10 times).
Change in youths' intention to use substances measured as likely responses to hypothetical substance use offers. Scale ranges from 1 (Definitely no) to 4 (Definitely yes).
Baseline (T1) drug resistance strategies
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.1157
± 1.43786
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.3364
± 1.78485
Academic Success Program
1.2695
± 1.5919
All Conditions
1.2177
± 1.57104
T2 drug resistance strategies
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
.7321
± 1.11529
Substance Use Prevention Only
.9273
± 1.50745
Academic Success Program
1.1853
± 1.79173
All Conditions
.9294
± 1.47036
T3 drug resistance strategies
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
.7445
± 1.34628
Substance Use Prevention Only
.9314
± 1.68751
Academic Success Program
.7874
± 1.49095
All Conditions
.8037
± 1.47654
Baseline (T1) intentions to use substances (higher score=higher intention)
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.0947
± .25029
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.2045
± .44381
Academic Success Program
1.1526
± .96982
All Conditions
1.1394
± .34513
T2 intentions to use substances (higher score=higher intention)
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.1046
± .30865
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.1545
± .35516
Academic Success Program
1.1809
± .41553
All Conditions
1.1419
± .35825
T3 intentions to use substances (higher score=higher intention)
Gauges the parent's sense of parenting competence and ability to positively influence the child's development. Scale from 1-5, with higher score=more agency.
Survey questions (parents) measuring: Change in parental monitoring. Average of a 9-item scale, where each question is measured on a 5-point scale (1=Never, 5=Always).
From Gorman-Smith, Tolan, Zelli \& Huesmann (1996) - These items measure the extent to which the parent is involved in the child's life. Respondents are asked to indicate how often they engage in certain interactions with their children (Q1-2) and how often the child is involved in family activities (Q3-10). For the first two questions, (when was the most recent time parent and youth talked about certain things), the scale goes from 1 (I don't know) to 5 (yesterday or today). For questions 3-10, activities include: how often the youth helps with family fun activities, how often parent and yout
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II (ARSMA-II) asks participants to indicate on a five point likert scale (Not at all (1) and Extremely often or almost always (5)) the extent to which they engage in certain cultural behaviors. The Mexican Orientation Subscale (MOS) consists of 17 Mexican oriented behaviors, which asks participants to indicate on the five point likert scale (Not at all (1) and Extremely often or almost always (5)) the extent to which they engage in Mexican-oriented behaviors. Means for each subscale are calculated, higher score indicates higher Mexican orientati
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II (ARSMA-II) asks participants to indicate on a five point likert scale (Not at all (1) and Extremely often or almost always (5)) the extent to which they engage in certain cultural behaviors. The Anglo Orientation Subscale (AOS) consists of 13 items, which asks participants to indicate on the five point likert scale (Not at all (1) and Extremely often or almost always (5)) the extent to which they engage in Anglo oriented behaviors. Means for each subscale are calculated, higher score indicates higher Anglo orientation.
Measures how often a person experienced certain acculturation situations and how stressful they were.
Scale ranges from 0 (No, did not happen to me) to 5 (Extremely stressful). Mean score is created, where higher values indicate more acculturative stress.
NCI Dietary Screener: Change in intake of vegetables- estimated cups per day
Baseline (T1) predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Parents
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.5737
± .44437
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.5656
± .43126
Academic Success Program
1.6431
± .54488
All Conditions
1.5957
± .47739
Baseline (T1) predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Youth
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.1755
± .92976
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.0472
± .58324
Academic Success Program
1.105
± .67146
All Conditions
1.1233
± .77842
T2 predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Parents
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.7107
± .56475
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.4978
± .38068
Academic Success Program
1.5468
± .34581
All Conditions
1.6031
± .46247
T2 predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Youth
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.0538
± .6498
Substance Use Prevention Only
.9821
± .27975
Academic Success Program
.9756
± .39423
All Conditions
1.0134
± .51151
T3 predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Parents
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.6077
± .43995
Substance Use Prevention Only
1.5163
± .39161
Academic Success Program
1.4687
± .3251
All Conditions
1.5391
± .3961
T3 predicted intake of vegetables per day (cup equivalents) - Youth
Group
Value
95% CI
Nutrition/Substance Use Prevention
1.0941
± .47764
Substance Use Prevention Only
.9209
± .32772
Academic Success Program
.9903
± .35313
All Conditions
1.0175
± .41021
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this study is to test if a parenting program can be used to prevent substance use among Latino youth and at the same time promote healthy eating. Pairs of 7th grade students and one of their parents will be enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to three groups: an existing parenting intervention focusing on substance use prevention (FPNG), the enhanced parenting intervention that also has nutrition content (FPNG+), and a comparison program focused on academic success. Only parents will attend intervention sessions. Data will be collected from the parent and their 7th grade student to see how these programs impacted substance use, nutrition, and parenting. The investigators hypothesize that families receiving the FPNG+ will have improved nutrition habits than the other conditions. Students in both FPNG and FPNG+ will have lower substance use rates as compared to the academic success program. In addition, the effects of parenting strategies and sociocultural factors on the FPNG and FPNG+ results will be studied.
Publications & conference data
3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Arizona State University
Last refreshed: 26 February 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03517111.